Context: How to do stage lighting<br>Know your performance genre and the simple principles behind lighting that genre. A standard play has lots of dialogue. An audiences ability to understand dialogue is directly linked with their visual connection with the speakers face.

Hypothesis: A standard play has at least two performers.

The prompt only mentions that a standard play has dialogue but does not mention whether a standard play features one or many performers.


Context: How to buy a golden retriever puppy<br>Learn about the breed. Before you commit to owning a golden retriever, you should learn a little about the breed to make sure their personality fits with your lifestyle and expectations for a pet. [substeps] Golden retrievers are very popular dogs.

Hypothesis: dogs are popular pets


Context: How to take action to help africa<br>Join the one campaign and receive their emails. Each email tells you something you can do to help. Write letters to your mayor and senators to keep pushing the government into helping.

Hypothesis: Emails are the best way to reach your mayor.

Nothing in the context says what is the best way to reach your mayor so it could be correct or incorrect.  I think it was difficult because it introduced email in a different way.


Context: How to take good college notes<br>Learn how your college professor teaches. For example, if your college professor tends to use powerpoint presentations but doesn't follow them word for word, it might be easier to use an outline note system instead of maybe copying the powerpoint verbatim, or using cornell notes. Consider using a specialized note-taking program.

Hypothesis: You should learn how your high school teacher teacher to take good notes.

The passage only talked about college not high school. There is no way to know what to do for high school.


Context: How to determine if you have adult adhd<br>Be aware of being easily distracted. Difficulty concentrating, getting bored very quickly, and a short attention span are where the' attention deficit' part of the name adhd come from. You can determine if you have adult adhd if you notice how often you are distracted.

Hypothesis: There are three characteristics of ADHD.

The passage lists three of them, but says that is where the name comes from. There could be other characteristics as well, or not. There is no way to know exactly how many there are.


Context: How to make taquitos<br>Heat the oil until it reaches 350 ° f (177 ° c). Place a heavy-bottomed pan with straight sides on the stove. Pour 2-inches (5-cm) of vegetable oil into the pan, and heat it over medium heat until the oil hits the right temperature on a deep fry thermometer.

Hypothesis: Taquitos can be prepared and stored in the fridge before frying.

There is no reason why they can't be prepared early.


Context: How to identify and care for lionhead goldfish<br>Check the fish you are preparing to buy, or if it is already in your tank, observe it. Lionhead goldfish have the following as physical traits : [substeps] Lionhead goldfish completely lack a stabilizing dorsal fin. If your fish has a dorsal fin, it is most certainly not a lionhead.

Hypothesis: Lionheads are just one color, orange.


Context: How to purchase a gas station<br>Study the traffic flow. When you first get the idea to buy a gas station, you need to become familiar with the location. Drive around the neighborhood.

Hypothesis: buying a gas station is easy

buying a gas station is not necessarily easy or hard, depending on who you are and what money you have.


Context: How to activate microsoft office on pc or mac<br>Open start wh. Performance. Clearmarks (' image1 _ rendered'); wh. Performance. Mark (' image1 _ rendered');. It's the button with the windows logo in the lower-left corner of the taskbar. Click an office product.

Hypothesis: This skill isn't needed.


Context: How to clean vinyl flooring<br>Use a doormat to keep the floor clean. The substances you track into your house on your shoes are damaging to vinyl flooring. Dirt, tiny pits of gravel, and chemicals from asphalt are abrasive to the vinyl, and over time will cause it to get scratched and yellowed.

Hypothesis: Scratched vinyl is very abrasive.

The context doesn't say how abrasive the vinyl is.  It only says that the dirt, gravel, and chemicals are abrasive.


Context: How to make bacon frosting<br>Cream the butter and sugar. In a medium-sized bowl, cream the butter and powdered sugar using an electric or hand blender on high speed for about two minutes. Cream until it's light, fluffy, and fully blended.

Hypothesis: The frosting will be chunky.


Context: How to defend against a psychological family violence claim<br>Keep records of all communications. Avoid speaking to someone who's accused you of psychological or emotional abuse unless those conversations can be recorded in some way. [substeps] When you do have to interact with them, do it over email or text message whenever possible so you can maintain a record of the conversation.

Hypothesis: The article is directed at victims of psychological family violence.

The article is directed at those accused of committing psychological family violence.


Context: How to downgrade your avg subscription on windows<br>Turn on your computer. Press the power button on your computer to turn it on. [substeps] The location of the power button will depend on your pc.

Hypothesis: If you press the power button on a PC, please be aware that some radiation can spill over.


Context: How to attach table legs<br>Shop around for table legs. You should have a number of choices at your closest home improvement store. This method is best for attaching legs to an already finished piece of furniture.

Hypothesis: Some tables hover.


Context: How to transfer songs from an ipod onto a computer<br>Connect the ipod to computer transfer it normally gets synced to. In itunes, under devices (in the source pane), select your ipod. Under the ipod's summary, select enable disk use.

Hypothesis: This method requires an internet connection.

Reason: It does not require a connection.  Why:  No internet connection is mentioned.


Context: How to prove similar triangles<br>Define the angle-angle (aa) theorem. Two triangles can be proved similar by the angle-angle theorem which states: if two triangles have two congruent angles, then those triangles are similar. [substeps] This theorem is also called the angle-angle-angle (aaa) theorem because if two angles of the triangle are congruent, the third angle must also be congruent.

Hypothesis: It is not possible to concretely prove similar triangles without substantial error

system seems to have been confused by sentence cadence


Context: How to grow roses organically<br>Plant the roses in a sunny garden with enough space for them to grow. During the first 1-2 years, water them often enough to keep the soil moist at all times. After that, water the plant with equal amounts of water 2-3 times per week.

Hypothesis: roses grow in 2 weeks


Context: How to get yourself into the christmas spirit<br>Play christmas music in the background while you prepare for christmas. Great songs such as " white christmas " by bing crosby, " o holy night " by josh groban and " believe " by josh groban are great examples, and they will help you lift your spirit. Make a batch of christmas cookies.

Hypothesis: There are no more than three Christmas songs.

It said that those three Christmas songs are examples of songs, which implies that there are more than three songs. If they are examples it means that they are just some of a larger group. My statement that there are only three is correct.


Context: How to make a green candy buffet<br>Select suitable containers for the candies. There are lots of container possibilities but the most important factor is ensuring that the containers will show off the green candies inside. As such, clear glass or plastic containers are an optimal choice, along with containers that lift up the candies and show them to their best advantage.

Hypothesis: The candies are colorful.

The candies are green - not any other color.


Context: How to calculate your body age<br>Find your resting pulse rate. The heart is one of the body's most important organs, and a well conditioned and healthy heart is a big part of overall well-being. A normal heart usually beats at between 60-100 times per minute.

Hypothesis: The best heart rate is 110.

It says that a normal heart beats between 60 and 100 so 110 would not be the best if it is not a normal heart.


Context: How to cook tomahawk ribeye steak<br>Purchase your steak. The tomahawk ribeye is a special type of cut steak which you may not be able to find in every local market. When purchasing this steak, you have to ask your butcher to cut it for you.

Hypothesis: you can't buy this steak at your local market.

This is incorrect as you might be able to it just depends.


Context: How to measure your gait speed<br>Evaluate your need for a gait test. Not everyone will need to measure their gait speed. Generally, this test is reserved for those that are suspected to have difficulty walking or have difficulty balancing.

Hypothesis: the accurate measurement of human gait has so far eluded researchers.

i think the system could not follow the complexity of the sentence


Context: How to make a lemon drop<br>Prepare the lemon slice, wedge, twist, or spiral. All lemon drop shooters should be garnished with something such as a lemon slice, wedge, twist, or spiral. Such garnishes are usually coated with sugar or make sure that the garnish contributes sweet as well as sour flavors.

Hypothesis: Cut the lemon into squares.


Context: How to catch a moth<br>Learn about moth behavior. Acquaint yourself with moth behavior before you begin catching the insects. This may help you more effectively catch a moth or moths.

Hypothesis: You can only catch a single moth, not more than one.

It talked about catching moths which would be more than one, so you can catch more than one.


Context: (b) are comparable to the employee benefits of the employee immediately before ceasing to be an employee of the local port corporation and at a rate of contribution by the employee not greater than the rate that was applicable in respect of the employee immediately before ceasing to be an employee of the local port corporation; and

Hypothesis: The benefits will remain relatively the same after leaving the employment as just before leaving.

It sates " are comparable to the employee benefits of the employee immediately before ceasing to be an employee of the local port corporation"


Context: Honourable senators will remember that the committee which reported just prior to Christmas received information about a number of cases in which claims were brought by people living in poverty in Canada, usually women and children, both alluded to by my colleagues who spoke before me, against our federal and provincial governments.

Hypothesis: there are cases of men living in poverty in canada

the cases are usually women and children, this means there are other cases. The only missing category is men so man have also made cases.


Context: A Member is doing something inherently connected with a ``proceeding in Parliament'' when putting down a question on the Order Paper, a notice of motion, a notice of motion for the production of papers, or a report stage amendment; when obtaining assistance to do any of these; or when obtaining assistance to draft a bill.

Hypothesis: This is a statement about rules of procedure.

The language here is providing examples of what  "proceeding in Parliament" is and is clearly meant to be used as a guide for how to determine if a proceeding in parliament is being intiated.


Context: By the way, they are going to build this fund and they are going to have some Liberal hacks running it unaccountable because there are clauses in here which, if they do not get changed, will make sure that the investment board of the Canada pension plan is not accountable to Parliament.

Hypothesis: The narrator is not a fan of the Liberal party.

He calls members of the party "hacks", so he clearly doesn't like the party. It's difficult because the system might not understand what it means to be a fan in this context.


Context: But we have several issues. One is that when we filed our motion to quash last week, quite honestly, we thought we did it in a timely fashion because we filed it only after we were served with the subpoena. Your Honor summarily dismissed that motion to quash, so, in effect, if my reporters were to be called upon to testify today by the plaintiffs, they're undressed.

Hypothesis: The speaker has issues other than the motion to quash.

The speaker says, "But we have several issues. One is that when we filed our motion to quash...", indicating that this is not the only issue he or she has.


Context: I wonder how he expects us to put forward a strong position on these issues if we are not part of the World Trade Organization or if we were not in a position, with meetings like Seattle, where we can pull together different countries from around the world that have a similar position to ours.

Hypothesis: Other different countries definitely have a similar position to the group that includes the speaker

The text says that there are other countries that they want to pull together that have a similar position to theirs


Context: Should Bill C-32 be enacted it will provide for the gathering of information for research and the creation of inventories of data, the publishing of objectives, guidelines and codes of practice, new powers for inspectors, investigators and laboratory analysis, many environmental protection alternative measures as well as civil suit action guidelines.

Hypothesis: Data will be more easily accessed once this bill is passed.

It is correct because the bill will allow for inventories of data to be accessed more effectively. The system thinks it could be either correct or incorrect because this is not a certainty.


Context: I recall my husband speaking. In fact, he hadn't prepared to speak, but he was very upset, as many people in the audience were, and he stood up to speak. I don't remember his exact comments, but, again, it was a warning to the school board and -actually, not necessarily a warning, but just sort of reiterating what science teachers do in their science classes and how there is really no conflict here with the textbook.

Hypothesis: My husband is a science teacher

The context says the husband spoke about what science teachers do, so it's correct to say he is a science teacher. The system probably found it hard to make the connection


Context: Well, I think again that illustrates why the authority is vested in Congress to make these judgments rather than in courts to make these affect whether the judgments, because we're not talking about the effect on an individual author, or an individual creator. What the Framers of the Constitution were concerned about is a gross judgment with respect to what might generally provide incentives to the population --

Hypothesis: Decisions Congress make impact society on a broad scale

It does belong because the decisions of congress impacts society as a whole, however it was difficult for the computer because it referenced the statements to the contrary "we're not talking about the effect on an individual author, or an individual creator" giving the implication that the opposite was true but not out-rightly stating it


Context: These criteria and conditions, pillars of Canada's health care system, are: one, reasonable access to medically required services unimpeded by charges at the point of service or other barriers; two, comprehensive coverage for medically required services; three, universality of insured coverage for all provincial residents on equal terms and conditions; four, portability of benefits within Canada and abroad; and five, public administration of the health insurance plan on a non-profit basis.

Hypothesis: health care in Canada is equal and fair.

I reworded a fact. This is what made it difficult.


Context: Let us reform the budget so that some day the working poor will pay no income tax, so that some day seniors on fixed incomes will no longer fear the taxman coming, so that some day all taxpayers will pay the same percentage rate of taxation, so that some day the federal government will live within modest means and help rather than hurt, and so that some day we will have viable universal medicare for everyone.

Hypothesis: If the budget is reformed then low earners will take home more of their pay

The context states that if the budget is reformed then 'the working poor will pay no income tax'. The system did likely not understand the phrase 'take home more of their pay' as meaning they will pay less tax.


Context: And that means that the local law enforcement officials need help at the federal level. Programs like Project Exile where the federal government intensifies arresting people who illegally use guns. And we haven't done a very good job of that at the federal level recently.

Hypothesis: Not all gun users have been properly vetted.

If local/federal police arrest those who use guns illegally, then not all gun users have gone through the proper vetting process. "vetting" may have confused AI


Context: More important, among those Canadian industries that seek protection under this act and certainly other Canadian stakeholders that may be adversely affected by the application of duties are organizations like the steel producers and, if someone looks downstream, the auto parts manufacturers as well.

Hypothesis: Canadian auto part manufacturers want the same protections as steel producers.

The system has trouble when you lump categories together possibly. By saying they want the same protections when they both want the act passed.


Context: It's certainly the case that we are asserting, in light of the changed circumstances, that the opportunity to build upon works within the public domain is a fundamental First Amendment interest, and that the First Amendment values, vital speech interest at stake of this case, is that the public domain be permitted as a source for cultivating work about our culture without unnecessary legal restriction.

Hypothesis: public domain should not have cumbersome restrictions

Public domain should not have cumbersome restrictions refers to legal restrictions which, in context, states that there should not be any interference from when adding to public domain.


Context: They are both already in application internationally; both are advantageous to passengers, shippers and carriers; they allow greater uniformity of the rules governing international air transportation; they will both contribute to lessening the risk of litigation within the aeronautical industry.

Hypothesis: both are advantageous to more than just carriers


Context: In other words you could have -- right now, if Congress decides to have a law, and this law is going to give copyrights in 1) the Bible, 2) Shakespeare, 3) Ben Jonson, and the reason they do it is that they think that that would lead publishers to produce those and distribute them, and they're right, they will, okay? In your view, that's perfectly constitutional?

Hypothesis: if congress decided to have law it doesn't have to give copyrights.

The law doesn't have to have copyrights. it says if the law has copyrights. I tricked it by saying the opposite it said while being a true statement.


Context: History will no doubt properly credit him and his government for their courage and foresight, initiatives such as the free trade agreement with the United States and NAFTA, abolishing the 13.5-per-cent manufacturers sales tax and introducing the 7-per-cent GST consumption tax to spur exports.

Hypothesis: It says history will no doubt properly credit him, which implies that the narrator is very confident that history is going to properly credit him.

It says that the history is going to no doubt credit him, which expresses high confidence.


Context: By doing so it has started a bold venture that will be one of the cornerstones of our effort as a government to ensure that Canada is the place to be, the place to live, the place that people want to come to and the place where people want to stay in the third millennium to take full advantage of the knowledge based society and economy of the 21st century.

Hypothesis: Canada is en route to becoming a desirable place to live


Context: Honourable senators, on November 16, the Honourable Jean-Maurice Simard called the attention of the Senate to the current situation vis--vis the development and vitality of francophone and Acadian communities, its gradual deterioration, the growing indifference of governments over the past ten years, and the lack of access to services in French.

Hypothesis: The Honourable Jean-Maurice Simard called the attention of the Senate to the current situation on an even-numbered day.

He called the attention on the 16th, and 16 is an even number. It's difficult because the system might not know what even/odd numbers are.


Context: They have to give labour concessions and more wage cuts and more benefit cuts in order to compete through the government's turning around and giving millions of dollars to another country to compete with ours, and not just a country with a good record, a country that has some of the worst human rights records in history.

Hypothesis: the country our government gave money to does not have a good record at all

this statement is definitely correct because the text says the country our country gave money to has a bad record


Context: But as we respect someone's rights, and as we profess tolerance, we shouldn't change -- or have to change -- our basic views on the sanctity of marriage. I believe in the sanctity of marriage. I think it's very important that we protect marriage as an institution, between a man and a woman.

Hypothesis: sanctity of marriage is a view by a lot of people


Context: Curriculum that works and phonics needs to be an integral part of our reading curriculum. Intensive reading laboratories, teacher retraining. I mean, there needs to be a wholesale effort against racial profiling, which is illiterate children. We can do better in our public schools.

Hypothesis: if they improve the curriculum then less kids will be illiterate

the context is about improving the curriculum to make teachers more effective at reducing illiterate children, So thats they statement I made, just paraphrased the context .


Context: (3) The refusal by a traveller to answer any question asked by a preclearance officer does not in and of itself constitute reasonable grounds for the officer to suspect that a search of the traveller is necessary for the purposes of this Act or that an offence has been committed under section 33 or 34.".

Hypothesis: Travellers reserve the right to remain silent.

A traveller's refusal to answer a question doesn't entitle an officer to search them.


Context: An October 22, 1998 article by Dianne Rinehart reported that according to an Angus Read poll, 51 per cent of British Columbians viewed the Nisga'a Final Agreement as a step in the right direction, with 33 per cent of those polled holding the opposite view and 16 per cent unsure of their views.

Hypothesis: dianne rinehart was a reporter

Not sure why that fooled the AI, maybe the context of the wording


Context: Instead of taking this advantage it will soon need in international negotiation, that is the experience of harmonizing two great traditions, the civil law and the common law, the government chose to set one of these traditions aside, the French one, to bury it, and forget about it.

Hypothesis: The government chose to set less than 3 traditions aside.

The government chose to set one of the traditions aside. The system was confused by the number.


Context: It's one of the reasons I'm a strong believer in what they call health savings accounts. These are accounts that allow somebody to buy a low-premium, high-deductible catastrophic plan and couple it with tax-free savings. Businesses can contribute, employees can contribute on a contractual basis. But this is a way to make sure people are actually involved with the decision-making process on health care.

Hypothesis: the person wants to save people money

he is speaking about cost savings related to healthcare


Context: -- what weighs in that balance, because to go back for one second, in practical, economic terms I gather the difference between a copyright that lasts for 100 years, lasts for 1,000 years, lasts forever, is probably something less than 1,000 -- on $1,000 a penny.

Hypothesis: A penny does not equal $1000

Yes a penny is equal to $0.01, which is not equal to $1000


Context: The petitioners are drawing attention to the fact that our region has been heavily affected by the groundfish moratorium imposed by Fisheries and Oceans Canada back in May 1994. Since then, the Atlantic Groundfish Strategy, or TAGS, has been the only means of survival for a large part of our population.

Hypothesis: Since 1994 the Atlantic Groundfish Strategy, or TAGS, has been not been the only means of survival for a small part of the population.

it says in the context that " since 1994, the Atlantic Groundfish Strategy, or TAGS, has been the only means of survival for a large part of our population."    So that means for the small remaining part of the population, this was not the only means of survival.                                                                                So the statement "   Since 1994 the Atlantic Ground fish Strategy, or TAGS, has been not been the only means of survival for a small part of the population. ", is definitely correct


Context: Uniformity is not a sine qua non, and this is where Pepin-Robarts in reminding us of the opting in and opting out facilities and raising the compensation in opting out provided the opportunity if there is a spirit of goodwill and of pragmatic compromise for working out arrangements to accommodate the increasing pluralism in our federal society.

Hypothesis: The first word in the statement is Uniformity


Context: If, in 1995, during the referendum debate in Quebec, the National Assembly had passed such a bill against the federalist vote, limiting it so that it would have less weight than the sovereignist vote, what would people have thought of the National Assembly and of its Parti Quebecois members?

Hypothesis: The bill against the vote wasn't passed.

The passage discusses what would have happened if the bill had passed. One would deduce that it didn't pass.


Context: Increased liabilities will add a little to the cost of marine insurance but commercial vessels insured in mutual protection and indemnity associations will probably see no substantive increase in insurance rates because coverage already provided by mutual associations is unlimited.

Hypothesis: Unlimited marine insurance has a high cost differential to the price of a policy for individual commercial vessels.

The price is not actually listed and can't be compared with the limited evidence.


Context: That's a place where we can use our generosity to influence in a positive way, influence nations. I believe we ought to have foreign aid, but I don't think we ought to just have foreign aid for the sake of foreign aid. I think foreign aid needs to be used to encourage markets and reform.

Hypothesis: foreign aid is only for the rich

This idea isnt stated but can be assumed based on the statement..


Context: Well, let's stay on the subject for a moment. New question related to this. I figured this out; in the last 20 years there have been eight major actions that involved the introduction of U.S. ground, air or naval forces. Let me name them. Lebanon, Grenada, Panama, the Persian Gulf, Somalia, Bosnia, Haiti, Kosovo. If you had been president for any of those interventions, would any of those interventions not have happened?

Hypothesis: The president could have intervene Somalia.

It is neither correct or incorrect because it depends on many factors


Context: I'm for working with the groups, not just with industry but also with the citizen groups and local communities to control sprawl in ways that the local communities themselves come up with. But I disagree that we don't know the cause of global warming.

Hypothesis: Global warming is caused by the sun.

No one really knows the cause of global warming.  It could be the sun and then again it could be something else.


Context: If the Liberals had listened to Reform in 1993 the government could have been investing in a farm safety net to protect farmers who are getting hammered by European Union subsidies and unfair trade practices by the U.S. So far there has been no response from the agriculture minister to Reform's proposals.

Hypothesis: The minister is working on a solution

This statement is neither correct nor incorrect, because we do not know what the minister is currently working on based on this context. The system may have thought the minister's lack of response indicates a lack of work, which is not necessarily the case


Context: I do, I do. The Persian Gulf, obviously. And Bosnia. And you have already talked about Kosovo. But the reverse side of the question, Governor, that Vice President Gore mentioned, 600,000 people died in Rwanda in 1994. There was no U.S. intervention, no intervention from the outside world. Was that a mistake not to intervene?

Hypothesis: The was no U.S. intervention in the Persian Gulf in 1994.

Interventions are mentioned in the context but the system does not know if that was why the Persian Gulf was mentioned.


Context: Towards Pollution Prevention'', the Standing Committee on the Environment and Sustainable Development recommended that the federal government take action under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act to regulate lead sinkers and jigs by prohibiting the import, sale, manufacture and use of lead sinkers and jigs by May 31, 1997.

Hypothesis: Nobody went out of business

It does not say whether or not anybody went out of business due to the ban, therefor making it neither incorrect or correct.


Context: If the hon. gentleman took the time to read the article, he would find quotes from me talking about the minister of heritage who last week publicly said that if there are meaningful amendments while preserving the very essence of the bill, that she is open to hearing them from the committee.

Hypothesis: I am a gentleman


Context: Your Committee, to which was referred Bill C-35, An Act to amend the Special Import Measures Act and the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act, has examined the said Bill in obedience to its Order of Reference dates, Wednesday, February 17, 1999, and now reports the same without amendment.

Hypothesis: The Committee was in session last Thursday.

Last Thursday could be the day they were in session or not.


Context: I think it's a triumph. I thought the president made the right decision in joining NATO and bombing Serbia. I supported them when they did so. I called upon the Congress not to hamstring the administration, and in terms of forcing troop withdrawals on a timetable that wasn't necessarily in our best interest or fit our nation's strategy, and so I think it's good public policy, I think it worked, and I'm pleased I took -- made the decision I made.

Hypothesis: The speaker is not talking extemporaneously.

I have no idea who this speaker is, let alone whether or not they prepared their statement ahead of time.  However, I seem to have thrown the system for a loop by inserting an obnoxiously long word that's not part of the context, but is still relevant.


Context: Why -- I mean, I think you have a point on this equity principle. I wonder, is there any review there? That is, suppose you have a statute, as this one arguably is, where 99.9 percent, many billions of dollars of benefits, are going to the existing holders of copyright on grounds of equity, and the effect of the statute in eliciting new works is near zero. I mean, that would seem -- where this equity idea is the camel and the production idea is the gnat, and is there any -- can we say something like that, or does Congress have total leeway in respect to --

Hypothesis: The speaker did not use the gnat to represent equity because they needed an animal that stores fat.

The speaker could have used the camel to represent equity because a camel stores fat like equity stores value, but the speaker did not explain themselves so we don't know for sure what they were thinking.


Context: If the union has recommended acceptance of this contract, and I assume then that it feels this is the best deal it can make, and the government is satisfied it is the best deal, it is fair to all concerned, does the Treasury Board president not feel that he may be endangering the ratification process by what we are doing here this evening?

Hypothesis: The Treasury Board president feels he may not be endangering the ratification process.

The union 100 percent recommended acceptance of this contract.


Context: With respect to the point that you made as it relates to their testimony at trial, that is a very valid point. However, I will tell you that the sense of my opinion as it related to their deposition testimony and as reconsidered and as honed in the reconsideration, was that it was meant to apply -- the general thrust of that, the protections, if you will, in that opinion were meant to apply in the same sense to their testimony at trial, if they chose to testify, and they would be protected in every way by the Court, and they would not be questioned in the broader sense.

Hypothesis: The defendant in the case was not protected by the courts, as originally agreed upon.

There was a sense that it was determined that those involved would be protected, but there is a possibility that a defendant was not given the same right.


Context: The CBO said very clearly that if you were to adopt the president's plan, there would be a $2 trillion hole in Social Security, because today's workers pay in to the system for today's retirees. And the CBO said -- that's the Congressional Budget Office; it's bipartisan -- they said that there would have to be a cut in benefits of 25 percent to 40 percent.

Hypothesis: The CBO does not support the presidents plan

It doesn't say if they support it or not, they just said there'd have to be cuts.


Context: And not only the training in police procedures, but human relations. And I think that racial profiling is part of a larger issue of how we deal with race in America. And as for singling people out because of race, you know, James Byrd was singled out because of his race in Texas.

Hypothesis: Nobody else had race profiling in Texas.

There is no way to know this answer from the given information. The system could not make this determination.


Context: My colleague from the Bloc Quebecois, the hon. member for Berthier-Montcalm, repeatedly questioned the Minister of Justice, asking her whether she thinks it is right for a major drug dealer like Joseph Lagana, who laundered nearly $47 million, to get paroled after serving only one sixth of his sentence.

Hypothesis: The Minister of Justice gave her opinion about Joseph Lagana.

It doesn't say if she answered the question or not. I guess the system assumed the question was answered.


Context: In fact, I may have been walking out of the room at the time and in close proximity to her. And so at the time when Max was speaking -- I believe that there were people who spoke in between she and Max Pell. But at the time when he stood to speak, I was in the restroom and sort of coming back from the restroom, so I don't really recall exactly what his comments were.

Hypothesis: The speaker knows the name of all people present.

The speaker refers to one person as She, but that doesn't mean he doesn't know her name.


Context: That's right. That's the important hurdle, and we'd like to jump that first, but the other ones, Justice, you're right, in 1831 and in 1909 Congress extended terms in a way that is inconsistent with the strongest form of the test that we have advanced. Those extensions, however, were never challenged in any court and certainly not considered by this Court.

Hypothesis: In 1909 Congress made  a bad decision to extend terms.

I have no idea why congress extended terms- it could have been bad or could not.


Context: But they see a compassionate, strong, great first lady in Laura Bush. I can't tell you how lucky I am. When I met her in the backyard at Joe and Jan O'Neill's in Midland, Texas, it was the classic backyard barbecue. O'Neill said, "Come on over. I think you'll find somebody who might interest you. "So I said all right. Bopped over there. There was only four of us there. And not only did she interest me, I guess you would say it was love at first sight.

Hypothesis: Laura Bush was interested in him.

it's neither correct nor incorrect because it doesn't say if she was or was not  interested at that time. I think the system read interested and assumed she was because he was.


Context: I have seen no indication that these Liberal members who sit on the justice committee and others who well over a year ago unanimously sent to the justice committee a supply day motion by the Reform Party that called for action are serious in any way about addressing the very serious crime of impaired driving.

Hypothesis: Liberal members don't take crime seriously.

It is unclear if Liberal members take crime seriously. The system was confused by the context.


Context: But you -- under your intermediate scrutiny test we would not be hypothesizing what might have been in Congress's mind. Your First Amendment test is a stringent one. You have to have an important purpose, and the means that you use is necessarily tied to that purpose. If you take that position, I don't see how you make the retroactive-prospective line work.

Hypothesis: The retroactive-prospective line will not work.

The writer claims, "If you take that position, I don't see how you make the retroactive-prospective line work." But that doesn't mean it can't work or won't work. The model took the writer's opinion as fact.


Context: Everything is a gift from the Almighty. And as I measure the words of the Bible -- and we all do; different people measure different things -- the Koran, the Torah, or, you know, Native Americans who gave me a blessing the other day had their own special sense of connectedness to a higher being. And people all find their ways to express it.

Hypothesis: the Almighty is considered violent

We do not know is the Almighty is considered peaceful or violent. There is no general consensus


Context: To do so requires looking beyond the legislation and the criminal justice system at ways available to our society to deal with problems such as child poverty and child abuse, which are often an underlying cause of youth crime, and to help young people not to make the kind of choices that may lead them to engage in criminal behaviour.

Hypothesis: All youth crime is vandalism.

From the context, we do not know specifically what criminal behaviour constitutes youth crime, it could be all, none, or some in regards to vandalism.  Therefore, the statement is neither definitely correct nor definitely incorrect.


Context: This story goes back a number of years to when a company from Nova Scotia, related by the way to the leader of the NDP, the L.E. Shaw group of companies, a very reputable company I might add, proposed doing a similar type of business, a quarrying business on the banks of the Saint Croix River in the Bayside Ports area.

Hypothesis: This story goes back more than 4 years ago

We don't know how many years ago it goes back, just several years which could mean anything


Context: I want to -- obviously in the egregious cases we need to enforce civil rights law, but we need to make sure that internal affairs decisions at the local level do their job and be given a chance to do their job. I believe in local control of governments, and obviously if they don't there needs to be a consequence at the federal level.

Hypothesis: civil rights law need to be enforce intermediately.

according to the text, they  need to enforce civil rights law, but we don't now if it has to be now.


Context: I ask today whether the parliamentary secretary, on behalf of the minister, will confirm that this commitment would not only address the issues I have listed but would also ensure that equivalent safety facilities to those of other airports with the same capacity such as Ottawa and Winnipeg are available for Halifax International Airport.

Hypothesis: Ottawa has a sunny beach.

From the context, we do not know whether or not Ottawa has a sunny beach, therefore the statement is neither definitely correct nor definitely incorrect.


Context: I understand that that's not what the defendants want in this case, but I don't think it's called for. And, as a matter of fact, I think if I did that and I ordered that and if -- I assume that the reporters would not testify and I would predict, if it went to the Third Circuit on that basis, I would be reversed. I don't think that that's a fair area of inquiry to get into.

Hypothesis: the reporters would be happy to help

it says the reporters would not testify but it never said they would not be happy to help and therefore it is neither correct or incorrect


Context: Honourable senators, I give notice that on Tuesday, September 21, 1999, I shall call the attention of the Senate to the financing of post-secondary education in Canada and particularly that portion of the financing that is borne by students, with a view to developing policies that will address and alleviate the debt load which post-secondary students are being burdened with in Canada.

Hypothesis: the senate will be financing post secondary education till no longer able in the country of canada

It did not give any frame of time to when it would stop


Context: Well, you know, certainly what is happening in the country today in the way of congressional -- under the Commerce Clause is totally different than what the Framers had in mind, but we've never felt that that was the criterion. What the Framers thought of, there weren't steamboats, there weren't railroads.

Hypothesis: This result was expected


Context: Mr. Speaker, I am prepared to move a motion to refer the matter of the minister's actions to the committee, if you find that there is a prima facie case, and there is no mandate from this House and no one has the right to represent that they may act for members of this House without specific authority from this House.

Hypothesis: I am not happy to move a motion but there is no specific authority from the house.

I introduced an emotional viewpoint that wasn't mentioned in the context but may have existed and the system may have found this nuance difficult to pick up on.


Context: And thirdly, we need an earned-legalization program for people who have been here for a long time, stayed out of trouble, got a job, paid their taxes, and their kids are American. We got to start moving them toward full citizenship, out of the shadows. SCHIEFFER: Do you want to respond, Mr. President?

Hypothesis: Mr. president responded because we need an earned-legalization program for people who have been here for a long time, stayed out of trouble, get a job, paid their taxes, and their kids are american.

It doesn't say the president responded or not; only that the person asked if he was going to. I think i tricked the system with the correct facts surrounding the unknown statement.


Context: Yes. I remember comments about our country being founded on Christianity and not needing to teach the faiths of other people. And I remember talking to my husband about that in the car ride home, as well, because we're both teachers and I was -- when I hear things like that, I immediately think of my students, and I was thinking about the diverse group of students that I have in my classroom, who all have different religious viewpoints, and how difficult that would be to tell one student that, you know, we can't express your belief, but we can express that person's belief in the classroom.

Hypothesis: The speaker is fictional.

There is no way to know if the speaker is fictional or real. It could be either.


Context: Hon. members will know that this official opposition attaches great importance to ensuring that parliament clearly states its intent in any bill that we consider or that we adopt, because if we do not, and the government is often sloppy in this area, we simply hand jurisdiction by default over to the courts, and that has been done far too many times.

Hypothesis: Parliament should be replaced with an unelected upper house.

From the context, we do not know whether or not Parliament should be replaced with an unelected upper house, therefore the statement is neither definitely correct nor definitely incorrect.


Context: When an agreement of this nature was being negotiated, the governments of the day, both governments-because I hold the Government of British Columbia equally responsible-should have understood from the very beginning that if they wanted it accepted by the people of British Columbia they had to include the people of British Columbia in the negotiations so that there would be an acceptance level there.

Hypothesis: The people of British Columbia will never accept the agreement

They may or may not. I think the system had difficulty because I used an absolute (never)


Context: For example, by suggesting that the Minister of Labour uses parliamentary immunity to take an unfair action against a person, he is implying that if he spoke outside the House of Commons the Minister of Labour would be subject to some kind of civil suit, so he is imputing motives to the Minister of Labour.

Hypothesis: The Minister of Labor is suggesting that they all don't not go out for pizza later.

The minister says nothing about pizza, but I guess the AI is confused.


Context: We are going to simply have them testify for the purpose of authenticating the contents of that article, nothing more, nothing less, because I really believe that to do more than that is to create, I think, a precedent which would have reporters called -- Mr. Benn, I think, fears that even this would do that. I don't share that fear. But to go any further than that would mean that a reporter's veracity could be questioned each and every time something like this comes up. I strain mightily not to have to do that. That's what I'm talking about. Now, I don't know if that clarifies it.

Hypothesis: they can refuse to testify


Context: And we have a fundamental choice to make. Are we going to step up to the plate as a nation the way we did after World War II, the way that generation of heroes said okay, the United States is going to be the leader. And the world benefitted tremendously from the courage that they showed in those post-war years.

Hypothesis: World War III will take place in 2025.

it's neither correct/incorrect because we have no idea if another World War will take place at all, let alone knowing what year specifically. It's difficult because the text mentions WWII, so this confused the system I guess.


Context: Mr. Speaker, given Canada's historic role as a supporter of peace, a mosaic of different cultures and an international proponent of democracy incorporation, the petitioners feel it would be fully appropriate for Canada to join the ranks of peace blossoms worldwide with the symbolic designation as a peace nation.

Hypothesis: Mr. Speaker will be Mr. Speaker next year.

Whoever the Speaker is, he may or may not be in that office next year. He could lose an election, he could die, he could retire. Or he might be Mr. Speaker for many more years.


Context: It is my duty, pursuant to Standing Order 38, to inform the House that the questions to be raised tonight at the time of adjournment are as follows: the hon. member for Mississauga West, Youth Employment; the hon. member for Cumberland-Colchester, Airport Safety; the hon. member for Wetaskiwin, Aboriginal Affairs.

Hypothesis: He is a member of the house

It doesn't explicitly state the person writing is a member of the house. He could be sergeant of arms or something but not be elected or an actual member.


Context: Yes, Jim. I've thought a lot about that particular question, and I see our greatest national strength coming from what we stand for in the world. I see it as a question of values. It is a great tribute to our founders that 224 years later this nation is now looked to by the peoples on every other continent and the peoples from every part of this earth as a kind of model for what their future could be.

Hypothesis: The country was founded in 1795

It was founded 224 years ago but it doesn't state when this was written


Context: With the exception of a limitation which illustrates the distinction between forever on the one hand and a definite number on the other, is there any limitation in the clause? Does the promotion, does the preambular recitation of promotion as such place a limit on it?

Hypothesis: limitation in the clause is known by bill


Context: And Charlotte Buckingham I recall really being the only person who got up to stand in defense of the school board, and she was Mr. Buckingham's wife, or is Mr. Buckingham's wife. And she quoted Scripture, Old Testament, actually, all Old Testament Scripture about why the school board is right, basically. And she also talked about school prayer and the need for school prayer in that speech that she had prepared.

Hypothesis: Charlotte Buckingham has talked to carter


Context: Let's see if we can do the same tonight, or come close. Governor Bush, the first question goes to you. One of you is about to be elected the leader of the single-most powerful nation in the world, economically, financially, militarily, diplomatically, you name it.

Hypothesis: The speaker this Governor Bush is going to be elected

The context does not indicate any preference from the speaker


Context: But if I went back to those groups that have been working on this problem for so many years and presented this option, this solution from the Reform Party, I think I would be greeted with ``oh no, not again, here we go, another attempt to try to solve this problem through legal provisions, another attempt to spend more money, more time, more effort on Criminal Code sanctions, another attempt to scratch the surface of this issue and never go beyond''.

Hypothesis: This issue has only two side.s

It could have multiple perspectives or sides.


Context: The American middle-class family isn't making it right now, Bob. And what the president said about the tax cuts has been wiped out by the increase in health care, the increase in gasoline, the increase in tuitions, the increase in prescription drugs.

Hypothesis: How to make a backyard badminton court you have one option

it is not stated clearly in the paragraph


Context: sets out the procedures that will have to be followed by businesses covered under this bill to make sure that the client is fully informed of the nature of the new service, of the date the new service is to begin, of its cost calculated monthly and annually, of the fact that the new service is not mandatory, of the fact that the client may obtain the new service by signing a business reply card, and of any other matter that may be prescribed.

Hypothesis: The businesses are not mandated to follow the procedures.

The bill will force the businesses to follow the new procedures.


Context: Yes, yes. But it's not a statement about his heart. I don't claim to know his heart. I think he's a good person. I make no allegations about that. I believe him when he says that he has a good heart. I know enough about your story to admire a lot of the things that you have done as a person.

Hypothesis: The statement references the four chambers of the heart.


Context: History will no doubt properly credit him and his government for their courage and foresight, initiatives such as the free trade agreement with the United States and NAFTA, abolishing the 13.5-per-cent manufacturers sales tax and introducing the 7-per-cent GST consumption tax to spur exports.

Hypothesis: He abolished the manufacturer's sales tax and GST consumption tax.

Actually, he & his govt. abolished the 13.5-per-cent manufacturers sales tax and INTRODUCED the 7-per-cent GST consumption tax. The partially correct statement fooled the model.


Context: It was sent out with no name on it, but it is under the heading "Standing Committee on Privileges, Standing Rules and Orders," which is scheduled to meet today, November 23, at 4:30 p.m. The agenda has five items on it, four of which have nothing to do with a question of privilege.

Hypothesis: Standing Committee on Privileges, Standing Rules and Orders does not have anything to do with the letter.

Standing Committee on Privileges, Standing Rules and Orders was the only thing written on the letter or envelope so the answer is incorrect.


Context: Many people are coming to this country for economic reasons. They're coming here to work. If you can make 50 cents in the heart of Mexico, for example, or make $5 here in America, $5. 15, you're going to come here if you're worth your salt, if you want to put food on the table for your families. And that's what's happening.

Hypothesis: The word "Mexico" has more than 3 vowels


Context: The measurement is not: Are we safer? The measurement is: Are we as safe as we ought to be? And there are a host of options that this president had available to him, like making sure that at all our ports in America containers are inspected. Only 95 percent of them -- 95 percent come in today uninspected. That's not good enough.

Hypothesis: The speaker is complaining that the president has not personally inspected all of the containers coming into America, even though that's an option available to him.

The speaker obviously does not think that the president should be personally inspecting the containers coming into American ports, and it is clearly not possible, and thus not an available option. This original statement was not particularly coherent, so I'm not surprised the system had trouble parsing it.


Context: It is also an occasion to salute the many people who give their time and skills to promote the personal growth and development of our children and young adults, and it is a time to remember the founders of the international scouting and guiding movement, Lord and Lady Baden-Powell, who started scouting in 1907 and guiding in 1909.

Hypothesis: Lord and Lady are the first names of the founders of the international scouting and guiding movement and not titles.

Lord and Lady are clearly noble titles of some sort, not names. The system presumably doesn't really know what lords and ladies are, so the context makes it's the couple's given names.


Context: I interpret the order and the amended order to mean that Your Honor, in a sense, has addressed them as fact witnesses. I don't think you actually come out and use the word "fact witnesses," but as one reads the order, that's the implication. And you initially had indicated that you did not feel that the reporter's privilege stood in this kind of a case.

Hypothesis: I don't think you actually come out and use the word "fat witnesses," but as one reads the order, that's the implication.

It's definitely incorrect because the text says "fact witnesses", not "fat witnesses". It's difficult for the system because they are very similar textually.


Context: In describing these features of the statutory review scheme in some detail, I want to emphasize that one of the important purposes of the scheme is to ensure that the people of Nunavut are not treated as second class citizens when it comes to the rights accorded to them by their court system.

Hypothesis: The narrator wants to emphasize that one of the important purposes of the scheme is to ensure that the people of Nunavut are treated as second class citizens.

It says "not treated", not "treated", therefore definitely incorrect. I guess it's difficult because I changed the text and said "the narrator', which probably confused the system.


Context: For three days we joined the anniversary trail ride commemorating the 1874 march west of the original North West Mounted Police contingent; a great adventure which originally took 275 officers and men from Fort Dufferin south of Winnipeg all through the southern part of Saskatchewan and southern Alberta to Fort Whoop-Up 125 years before.

Hypothesis: 275 men from Fort Dufferin took 125 years to travel to Winnipeg


Context: This practice of forbidding the use of direct citations from the debates of the House of Commons, euphemistically identified as "the other place," was originally intended to prevent, according to Erskine May, fruitless arguments between members of two distinct bodies who are unable to reply to each other and to guard against recrimination and offensive language in the absence of the other party.

Hypothesis: The practice had contained use of direct citations

It says it prohibited the use, so this is incorrect


Context: That stands in stark contrast, by the way, to a man who is going to leave 50 million -- 50 million Americans out of tax relief. We just have a different point of view. It's a totally different point of view. He believes only the right people ought to get tax relief.

Hypothesis: 50 Americans will not have tax relief.

the sentence says 50 million, not 50. I think the system over looked the written out numbers.


Context: This government had better be prepared to reinforce the budgets of these institutions that we rely on to protect our security, the security of our industries and the high tech development occurring, to protect those secrets from encroachment and incursion by forces outside of our country that have almost an open door to move across our borders into our country and set up their espionage organizations to take these secrets from our very high tech society in this country and use them against us.

Hypothesis: This government had better be prepared to reinforce the budgets of these institutions that we rely on to protect our cars

We rely to protect our security, not cars.


Context: I have got a comprehensive strategy to not only chase down the Al Qaida, wherever it exists -- and we're making progress; three-quarters of Al Qaida leaders have been brought to justice -- but to make sure that countries that harbor terrorists are held to account.

Hypothesis: 50% of Al Qaida leaders have escaped justice

It is incorrect because it says that 75% of the leaders have been brought to justice, so 50% couldn't have escaped. No more than 25% could have. The system possibly doesn't translate three-quarters to 75%


Context: What I'm saying is, is that as we promote life and promote a culture of life, surely there are ways we can work together to reduce the number of abortions: continue to promote adoption laws -- it's a great alternative to abortion -- continue to fund and promote maternity group homes; I will continue to promote abstinence programs.

Hypothesis: This passage is about education


Context: I think a lot of times we just spend aid and say we feel better about it and it ends up being spent the wrong way, and there's some pretty egregious examples recently. One being Russia, where we had IMF loans that ended up in the pockets of a lot of powerful people and didn't help the nation.

Hypothesis: The text mentions at least two countries.

It's definitely incorrect because only one country, Russia, is mentioned. It's difficult because the word nation is also used, so perhaps the system thought this was a separate country.


Context: Subsequently, the reporters were, if memory serves, approximately eight days ago, subpoenaed to testify by the plaintiffs in the case-in-chief. Yet another motion to quash or for alternative relief was filed by the reporters through Mr. Benn's office.

Hypothesis: The reporters were subpoenaed to testify less than a week ago, according to this person's memory.

According to this person's memory, they were subpoenaed approximately 8 days ago, which is not less than a week ago. It's difficult because the text mentions days, whereas the statement mentions weeks, so this might have confused the system.


Context: What I have done is what every member of parliament has an obligation to do and that is to make sure that the programs that apply to the constituents under the job creation program apply to the people who voted for the member for Saint-Maurice just as the programs apply to the members for Prince George-Peace River, Kootenay-Columbia, Kootenay-Boundary-Okanagan, Dauphin-Swan River, Esquimalt-Juan de Fuca, Cariboo-Chilcotin, and so on.

Hypothesis: What we have done is what every member of parliament has an obligation to do and that is to make sure that the programs

The narrator says it is what they have done, not "we". I think the model got confused because the change is so subtle.


Context: Jim, one of the issues that I would like to close with in my statement is education, because it's an example of the overall approach that I think is important. This race is about values, it's about change, it's about giving choices to the American people.

Hypothesis: The person speaking is Jim.

It looks more like the person speaking is saying Jim, like take a pause.


Context: The Bloc Quebecois believes that the renewal of the SFOR mandate in Bosnia-Hercegovina should be accompanied by increased support for the International Crime Tribunal, a more significant support for this international court, which is playing a fundamental role with regards to the aftermath of the conflict in Bosnia-Hercegovina.

Hypothesis: The Bloc Quebecois does not believe that the renewal of the SFOR mandate in Bosnia-Hercegovina should not not be accompanied by increased support for the International Crime Tribunal.

I used a triple negative, which confused the AI.


Context: Mr. Speaker, the second petition deals with concerns about child pornography, specifically in British Columbia, and the fact that the B.C. Court of Appeal has struck down subsection 163(1)(4) of the criminal code that makes possession of child pornography a criminal offence and that the court decision is therefore placing children in British Columbia at risk.

Hypothesis: Subsection 163(1)(4) of the criminal code in British Columbia does not deem possession of child pornography as a criminal offence

This is incorrect because subsection 163(1)(4) does indeed deem possession of child pornography as a criminal offence.


Context: The motion reads as follows: ``That this House request that the government convey to the governor of the state of Texas, the hon. George W. Bush, and to parole authorities of this state, its very serious concern about the violation of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations in the case of Mr. Stanley Faulder, a Canadian citizen who is to be executed on December 10, 1998 at Huntsville State Prison; and further, that the government convey this House's respectful request that the execution be stayed pending a judicial review of the case to ensure that due process has been followed''.

Hypothesis: George W. Bush was president on December 10, 1998.


Context: I would agree. And I also agree that most police officers, of course, are doing a good job and hate this practice also. I talked to an African-American police officer in Springfield, Massachusetts not long ago who raised this question and said that in his opinion one of the biggest solutions is in the training.

Hypothesis: I talked to an African-American police officer in Springfield, Massachusetts long ago who raised this question and said that in his opinion one of the biggest solutions is in the training.

it was not long ago it should have been not too long ago but the rest was verbatim so the AI recognized it as correct


Context: Justice, we are not making an empirical claim at all. Nothing in our Copyright Clause claim hangs upon the empirical assertion about impeding progress. Our only argument is, this is a structural limit necessary to assure that what would be an effectively perpetual term not be permitted under the copyright laws.

Hypothesis: The passage mentions more than one argument.


Context: Got four more years, I've got more to do to continue to raise standards, to continue to reward teachers and school districts that are working, to emphasize math and science in the classrooms, to continue to expand Pell Grants to make sure that people have an opportunity to start their career with a college diploma.

Hypothesis: Pell Grants contains a xx


Context: I agree, and this Court has -- just talking about the judgment of the Congress the 105th Congress in 1998. This is the way the argument that somehow implicitly the initial 1790 copyright statute was saying to people, you get a copyright if you exchange whatever existing rights you have. That simply does not make any sense. There is no language, and it's a relatively late-discovered argument, because it sees its full --

Hypothesis: The 105th Congress was responsible for the 1790 copyright statute

The 105th Congress was active in 1998. I think the system got it wrong because I stitched two correct concepts together.


Context: The port authority may establish a certain fashion of operation based on the bylaws that are in place now in the neighbouring municipality or jurisdiction and then all of a sudden, if that jurisdiction were to change its bylaws, it could cause the port authority to have to make substantial and profound changes in the way it operates.

Hypothesis: It would be completely illegal for the port authority to change any of its bylaws that would alter their operations.

I fooled the system by the wording I used.


Context: Tonight the topic will be domestic affairs, but the format will be the same as that first debate. I'll moderate our discussion under detailed rules agreed to by the candidates, but the questions and the areas to be covered were chosen by me. I have not told the candidates or anyone else what they are.

Hypothesis: the topic will be domestic affairs, moderated on rules and questions agreed to by the candidates.

i wrote "the topic will be domestic affairs, moderated on rules and QUESTIONS agreed to by the candidates."


Context: No, absolutely not. I don't object to Pandas being in the library, just like I don't object to, you know, any of the other books being in the library, as long as -- as long as it's the appropriate level and -- you know, I mean, there is a censorship process that goes into putting books in the library. So, I mean, as long as it has gone through that process and it's approved to be there, I don't have a problem with it being there.

Hypothesis: I don't object to Pandas being in the library unlike some other book


Context: I say to the government, to the people of this country and certainly to members of parliament that it is our duty and responsibility to ensure that we are not led down the garden path by ideologies put forward by extremely passionate interventionists, if I can use the term used by the member for Broadview-Greenwood.

Hypothesis: The narrator is using their own words and thoughts

The narrator admits to using the words of other members


Context: It says, and I agree with my colleague from the New Democratic Party on this, that instead of cutting a total amount of $48 billion between now and the year 2003, cutting $48 billion in higher education, social assistance and health, the government will only be cutting $42 billion.

Hypothesis: The government will only be cutting 41.99 billion.

41.99 is close to but not exactly 42 billion, the AI is confused.


Context: If we look at the thrust of the bill we can see that the key things this bill is trying to do is to make sure that telemarketers give fair and reasonable disclosure of information at the beginning of each call, including the identity of the company, the purpose of the communication, the nature of the product, business or interest, the price, material restrictions and any terms and conditions applicable to delivery.

Hypothesis: The bill will require consumers to listen to the telemarketers phone calls completely

The bill does not require consumers to do anything, therefore it is definitely incorrect.


Context: I have, I have. First question is what's in the best interests of the United States? What's in the best interests of our people? When it comes to foreign policy that will be my guiding question. Is it in our nation's interests? Peace in the Middle East is in our nation's interests.

Hypothesis: War in the Middle East does not impact other nations.

The speaker is talking about the interests of the United States, but when I posed the questions I stated "other nations", leaving the country ambiguous. The United states is not part of the Middle East and would be considered "other nations" outside of the Middle East, making the statement false, but creating difficulty for the computer


Context: All right. Now, previously, on September 12th, the Court entered an order which went to the motion for reconsideration. That related specifically to -- filed by the reporters. That went specifically to our August 2nd order which, in effect, said that the reporters would have to testify at certain depositions.

Hypothesis: September only has eleven days.

If something was entered on September 12th, we know from the context that September has more than eleven days, so the statement that September only has eleven days is definitely incorrect.


Context: I think that we also have to keep a weather eye toward Saddam Hussein because he is taking advantage of this situation to once again make threats, and he needs to understand that he's not only dealing with Israel, he is dealing -- he's dealing with us if he is making the kind of threats that he's talking about there.

Hypothesis: Hussein has seven letters in his first name.

Saddam has six letters. The system was confused by the context.


Context: Finally, although we agree completely with the protection of health, as I mentioned earlier, we have not forgotten that this is a provincial jurisdiction and that Bill C-71 allowed the federal government once again to interfere in a sector that the provinces are quite capable of managing on their own, as evidenced by the recent tobacco legislation passed in Quebec City.

Hypothesis: They agree somewhat on the issue of health

This statement is definitely incorrect, because they do not agree "somewhat," they agree "completely." The system may have gotten hung up on the word "agree," disregarding the adverb "somewhat."


Context: Among the changes made to CEPA, Bill C-32 includes the provision to implement pollution prevention, new procedures for the investigation and assessment of substances and new requirements for toxicity assessments, new provisions respecting fuels, international air and water pollution, motor emissions, federal and aboriginal land protection, the proper disposal of wastes and other matters at sea and the safer export and import of waste.

Hypothesis: Bill C-32 will damage the oceans.

Bill C-32 affects removing pollution from oceans, so it cannot damage them.


Context: My friend, Senator Spencer Abraham of Michigan, is pushing a law to make sure that Arab-Americans are treated with respect. So racial profiling isn't just an issue at local police forces. It's an issue throughout our society. And as we become a diverse society, we're going to have to deal with it more and more.

Hypothesis: Spencer Abraham has a xx


Context: We need the independence to make sure that the office will not interfere with the military structure whatsoever and that it will act as an ombudsman for people in the military structure, either family members in the military, the military personnel themselves or civilian members of the Canadian Armed Forces who are involved with the military.

Hypothesis: We need the independence to make sure that the office tv show will not interfere with the military structure

It says it needs to be sure that the office will not interfere, not "the office tv show" because it has nothing to do with that.


Context: I agree, and this Court has -- we're not just talking about the judgment of the Congress of the -- the 105th Congress in 1998. This is the way the Statute of Anne was written. This is the way the State copyright laws were written when this country became a Nation. This is the way the 1790 copyright statute, the number of --

Hypothesis: anne wrote a statute in order to stop people from copying right handed people.

anne wrote the state to stop copyrighting not copying right handed people


Context: And yes, I think it's something that people need to consider. This isn't something new. I read a report, or a memo, from somebody in his 1988 campaign -- I forgot the fellow's name -- warning then Senator Gore to be careful about exaggerating claims. I thought during his debate with Senator Bradley saying he authored the EITC when it didn't happen.

Hypothesis: The name of the fellow who wrote the report in question is Mr. Bradley.

The report was from an unnamed man in Gores 1988 campaign. Not Mr. Bradley, who was debating Gore. I think the model got confused by changing Senator Bradley to Mr. Bradley.


Context: In the negotiations over the past two years, it is understandable that table 2 union members had no hesitation using their right to strike, which they had obtained on December 16, 1998. So, in a perfectly legal context, the union is exercising its means of pressure by holding rotating strikes across the country since January 18.

Hypothesis: Strikes began on New Year's day.


Context: Let me just tell you who the jury is. The people of Texas. There's only been one governor ever elected to back-to-back four-year terms, and that was me. And I was able to do so with a lot of Democrat votes, nearly 50% of the Hispanic vote, about 27% of the African-American vote, because people know I'm a conservative person and a compassionate person.

Hypothesis: More than half of the Hispanic vote  went to the governor

It was 'nearly' 50% of hispanic vote, not 'more than' 50%


Context: The leader of the New Democratic Party should know that the science advisory board which I appointed some months ago, chaired by the distinguished Dr. Roberta Bondar and including 15 or 20 outstanding Canadian scientists, is now doing an audit of the science capacity of Health Canada.

Hypothesis: There could be 17 canadian scientists on the board

This is false. It says there is 15 or 20 specifically, not between 15 and 20


Context: In this case, the change agreed to between the Department of Canadian Heritage and the department concerned takes precedence over other regulations under the Fisheries Act, the Coastal Fisheries Protection Act, the Canada Shipping Act, the Arctic Waters Pollution Prevention Act, the Navigable Waters Protection Act or the Aeronautics Act.

Hypothesis: The Department of Canadian Heritage cannot disagree with the Coastal Fisheries Protection Act

The statement says that an agreement with this department has taken precedence over this act, indicating the two must disagree in some manner.  I am not sure why the model cannot predict this one.


Context: That's right. That's the important hurdle, and we'd like to jump that first, but the other ones, Justice, you're right, in 1831 and in 1909 Congress extended terms in a way that is inconsistent with the strongest form of the test that we have advanced. Those extensions, however, were never challenged in any court and certainly not considered by this Court.

Hypothesis: Congress extended terms in 2009 in an inconsistent way

No Congress extended terms in an inconsistent way in 1831 and 1909


Context: This dialogue with western Canadians showed us that, beyond the hollow rhetoric, do-nothing attitude and piecemeal approach of the Liberal government, ways can be found to establish sound political relations, based on a new partnership that will serve the interests of both Canada and Quebec.

Hypothesis: The new partnership will serve the interest of North America.

The new partnership will serve the interest of Canada and Quebec, not the United States.


Context: Mr. Chief Justice, and may it please the Court: The questions today, especially the initial questions, suggest one of the many insurmountable obstacles to petitioners' petition in, position in this case. That is that the first Congress explicitly gave copyright protection to the authors of any books already printed as well as explicitly the owners of existing copyrights.

Hypothesis: The court session is to discuss issues other than copyright

The context makes is clear that the session is to discuss issues related to copyright, so it is incorrect to say that they are there to discuss other things. The system probably did not understand this


Context: During the years between World War I and World War II, a great lesson was learned by our military leaders and the people of the United States. The lesson was that in the aftermath of World War I, we kind of turned our backs and left them to their own devices and they brewed up a lot of trouble that quickly became World War II.

Hypothesis: During the years between World War I and World War II, a great lesson was learned by our military leaders and the people of the United No.

It was united states, not united no. I think that confused the model by putting "no"


Context: In the Senate we passed the right of Americans to import drugs from Canada. But the president and his friends took it out in the House, and now you don't have that right. The president blocked you from the right to have less expensive drugs from Canada.

Hypothesis: Drugs are more expensive in Canada.

The president blocked you from the right to have less expensive drugs from Canada, so they are less - not more - expensive. Maybe the model thinks they are more expensive because the legislation failed??


Context: In my home province of Prince Edward Island during one year alone there were 6,845 calls received by Transition House Association; 1,201 calls received by the Child Abuse Line; and 757 new cases opened by Victims Services, of which 108 were sexual abuse cases, 242 wife abuse cases, and 46 other family abuse cases.

Hypothesis: Transition house is located at 1201 Child Abuse Line.

I just made the address up by using the names of two of the agencies mentioned and one of the numbers of calls made. It is completely fabricated. I think the system just looks for words/numbers from the text.


Context: For example: to have diplomatic initiatives to diffuse the tensions between ethnic groups and encourage peacekeeping initiatives between these rival groups; to introduce positive information to counter the negative information that is being spread; to have an international arms registry that deals with specific arms, which would go a long way to adding a measure of transparency and accountability where there are military organizations.

Hypothesis: This passage is written in spanish.

The passage is written in english so it's clearly not written in spanish. The system may not know the difference in languages.


Context: This new paragraph clarifies for organizations the circumstances under which they may accede at their discretion to the legitimate requests of government institutions for personal information, for national security, law enforcement and administrative purposes where they have lawful authority.

Hypothesis: The new paragraph makes it more clear for organizations what circumstances they must accede to requests from all authoritarian figures for personal information where they have lawful authority.

The consent is not to ALL authoritarian figures, only those listed.


Context: Instead of talking about replacement workers, maybe we should be talking about replacing the dispute settlement mechanism in the labour code so that we actually have something that means Canadians will be able to keep their jobs and there will be a reasonable, viable alternative to going out on strike.

Hypothesis: we want to replace workers


Context: The debate on the bill is whether a proper balance is being struck between the rights of the accused and the rights of society as represented by law enforcement agencies charged with the responsibility and duty to bring criminals to justice, investigate crimes and have a sufficiently strong record in terms of success that it would be a deterrent to those who plan and commit premeditated acts against an individual.

Hypothesis: The bill is being debated because vigilante justice is taking over society

The bill is being debated because law enforcement hates puppies


Context: They have to give labour concessions and more wage cuts and more benefit cuts in order to compete through the government's turning around and giving millions of dollars to another country to compete with ours, and not just a country with a good record, a country that has some of the worst human rights records in history.

Hypothesis: The opposing country has labour concessions.

Our country in this context is the one that has labour concessions.


Context: They are only interested when commodity prices are going up, as they were when oil prices went up and Western Canadians were reaping the benefits of world prices and hence we had the National Energy Program imposed by the Liberals, a program that redistributed billions of dollars all across Canada, money that belonged to the producing provinces.

Hypothesis: The statement was made by a liberal person.

The statement stated about the National Energy Program imposed by the Liberals that went to Canada but not the producing provinces. The statement is negative against Liberals so they are not Liberals.


Context: Mr. Speaker, Robert Kennedy once said each time a person stands up for an ideal, strikes out against injustice, they send forth a tiny ripple of hope, and crossing each other from a million different centres of energy, those ripples build a current that can sweep down the mightiest walls of resistance.

Hypothesis: Mr. Speaker was Robert Kennedy

The speaker was talking about Robert Kennedy not speaking to him directly


Context: Second, the aim of the initiative is to expand the category of offences for which a young offender may be brought before a regular court, which will include, in addition to murder, attempted murder, manslaughter and violent sexual assault, the reiteration of the facts of the crime and will lower from 16 to 14 the age at which young offenders may be transferred to an ordinary court.

Hypothesis: the age to go to court goes from 16 up to 14

I said it goes UP to 14, that makes no sense


Context: That's fine. And I note that, and that's why I wanted to do this on the record. And I understand that you object to that, and I understand the defendants have interposed not only this objection but they have also argued against that. And to the extent that this really clarifies and reasserts what I have in my prior orders, I think you've preserved your position as it relates to that, and I understand that position.

Hypothesis: I is said twice


Context: Well, the line comes from deciding what the First Amendment interest is, and if this Court heed the First Amendment interest off of this difference between selecting who gets the benefit of 20 years of extension and just simply legislating in a general way prospectively, then this Court could hold, with respect to the prospective, that it's not even necessary to raise the intermediate scrutiny in that context, but again, for Ashwander reasons we don't think that this Court should address the prospective aspect of the CTEA even under the First Amendment.

Hypothesis: This case involves the Declaration of Independence

This case involves the Constitution and Bill of Rights not the Declaration of Independence.


Context: I do. I think that in this 21st century we will soon see the consequences of what's called global warming. There was a study just a few weeks ago suggesting that in summertime the north polar ice cap will be completely gone in 50 years. Already people see the strange weather conditions that the old timers say they've never seen before in their lifetimes.

Hypothesis: the study was on the poler bear decline


Context: Increased liabilities will add a little to the cost of marine insurance but commercial vessels insured in mutual protection and indemnity associations will probably see no substantive increase in insurance rates because coverage already provided by mutual associations is unlimited.

Hypothesis: Increased liabilities will increase costs to commercial vessels

"ommercial vessels insured in mutual protection and indemnity associations will probably see no substantive increase in insurance rates "


Context: Farmers are going to find out how the decision was made to make a public announcement that our grain was not selling in Japan and why this government was unable to settle the labour negotiations to keep our grain moving; and not only settle negotiations, but in fact have legislation in place to facilitate grain movement.

Hypothesis: Japan is not buying a lot of grain.

The agent said that an announcement was made stating that our grain was not selling in Japan.  I think the change is vocabulary tricked the system.


Context: In the last debate, my opponent said those lawsuits only caused the cost to go up by 1 percent. Well, he didn't include the defensive practice of medicine that costs the federal government some $28 billion a year and costs our society between $60 billion and $100 billion a year.

Hypothesis: the federal government has money

Saying that the federal government has costs to pay each year is an implication that the federal government has money because that is the only way to pay said costs.


Context: Yeah, no question about that, but there also needs to be strong enforcement of the law. Some kid who feels like -- doesn't matter where the gun comes from, it could be a cheap gun, expensive gun. What matters is something in this person's head says there is not going to be a consequence.

Hypothesis: The speaker is a big fan of law-enforcement


Context: If her reference is to Premier Clark, I assume Premier Clark has by now spoken to his minister of health with whom I spoke yesterday and has been reminded that the British Columbia government was at the table, part of the discussions, part of the agreement, and stands solidly with the rest of the governments of the country behind this agreement.

Hypothesis: They have an agreement with the minister.

They do have an agreement with the minister.


Context: The Canada pension plan contribution rate increased to 7% from 6.4% in January 1999, which is an annual increase of $1.4 billion taken out of the pockets of Canadian taxpayers, whether they are business owners and their businesses are having to pay their portion or people who are actually on the frontline doing the work.

Hypothesis: they found themselves losing more money due in part to a law

According to the statement, more money was taken away from Canadians at the beginning of the year as a result of the law. This makes my statement correct. The model seemed to be confused with common vs proper nouns. It would probably catch me if I used the word Canadians, but the word they would slip under its radar.


Context: The report of the special joint committee quotes from Mr. Borovoy, page 9: ``The state of equality and fairness can only benefit by the abolition of special preferences for any denominational groups even if those denominations happen to comprise a large percentage of the population.

Hypothesis: Special preferences does not help equality and fairness.


Context: Jim, one of the issues that I would like to close with in my statement is education, because it's an example of the overall approach that I think is important. This race is about values, it's about change, it's about giving choices to the American people.

Hypothesis: The statement was addressed to a man whose full name may be James.

System missed that Jim is usually short for James


Context: On the other hand, they've said that it enhances state standards and critical thinking. In my mind, everything that you do in a classroom is teaching. And I don't necessarily think that's just in my mind. I believe that's true of all educators. The way I dress when I go to work tells my students something.

Hypothesis: Everything you do and wear in every classroom, even the minor details such as what clothes you have on, is teaching

The statement stated that even the clothes that you wear teach something, so my statement was correct


Context: This will be a major incentive to universities and teaching and research hospitals across Canada to not only take advantage of the foundation for innovation and its assistance in upgrading and building research infrastructure but also to make use of the $400 million that has been made available to the university research granting councils to further support the performance of international quality research in this country.

Hypothesis: Canada has places to learn in it

Canada has places to learn in it, otherwise they wouldn't propose this


Context: Well, there's a law pending called the Employment Non-Discrimination Act. I strongly support it. What it says is that gays and lesbians can't be fired from their job because they're gay or lesbian. And it would be a federal law preventing that. Now, I wonder if the -- it's been blocked by the opponents in the majority in the Congress. I wonder if the Governor who lend his support to that law.

Hypothesis: Gays can be fired now.


Context: One feature of the summary trial reform that was discussed at length in committee was the requirement to provide commanding officers with more comprehensive training in their military justice duties and responsibilities and to have them certified as qualified to conduct summary trials.

Hypothesis: The summary trial reform will make a difference in the training.

It said that the The summary trial reform will make it that they get more comprehensive training so my statement is correct.


Context: Were I to have had the opportunity to elaborate on the comments that I began, I would demonstrate to the member opposite that the amount of latitude leads us into the situation where we have to wonder whether the bill, as currently written, is going to have the effect that we desire.

Hypothesis: The speaker is unsure about the bill

The speaker's statement reflects the words written in the statement making my statement correct. The model was probably looking for a certain pattern of words. My statement passed because it didn't reflect that pattern of words.


Context: We have to try to get to the heart of those problems: problems surrounding the murder of a Somalia civilian; the cover-up of the murder; the failure of the general staff and the government to hold anyone accountable for their actions or omissions; the cultural secrecy within the Department of National Defence; and the double standards in the military justice system all became very evident during the Somalia inquiry.

Hypothesis: Somalia is not a person


Context: It has gone through all the stages of the democratic system in Canada and Quebec, and you can be sure that not a single Bloc Quebecois member of Parliament will oppose the proper workings of democracy in this country called Canada, and in the emerging country which will be called Quebec.

Hypothesis: The members won't oppose how the government works.


Context: I think it's important to promote a culture of life. I think a hospitable society is a society where every being counts and every person matters. I believe the ideal world is one in which every child is protected in law and welcomed to life. I understand there's great differences on this issue of abortion, but I believe reasonable people can come together and put good law in place that will help reduce the number of abortions.

Hypothesis: Reducing the number of abortions is this persons goal.

The passage states that they think people can come together to reduce abortions.


Context: We have fought to try to raise the minimum wage in the last years. But the Republican leadership of the House and Senate won't even let us have a vote on it. We're not allowed to vote on it. They don't want to raise the minimum wage. The minimum wage is the lowest minimum wage value it has been in our nation in 50 years.

Hypothesis: The republican leaders do not want a higher minimum wage, that is the reason why they do not allow a vote on it

The text stated that the republicans are blocking the vote on minimum wage, so my statement was correct


Context: Also when someone like Daniel Johnson, the present leader of the Quebec Liberal Party who will face the premier in a campaign debate in a few weeks or months, takes a stand on the critical issue of democracy, like he did this week, all the political parties in the House should understand that, by rejecting the Bloc's motion they would be rejecting a well-established consensus in the province.

Hypothesis: The leader is an influential man

All leaders of political parties are influential, and his influence is supported by the speaker saying his views are a representation of the people. This makes my statement correct. The model was probably fooled because my statement is on the borders of neither correct nor incorrect. It's an easy assumption to make because the wording is vague instead of specific


Context: Let us harness our wealth of wisdom and our desire for truth to work on how to get our marginalized citizens a security of livelihood, the young an opportunity to transform their education into a production mode, and the people of our coastal communities into the dignity of earning their daily bread.

Hypothesis: the speaker is socially progressive caring about the needs of others

The speaker's actions clearly show off her kindness and awareness of the issues faced by society making my statement correct. The model was probably thrown off by the vague wording of my statement


Context: Historically, government intervention at all levels, but certainly at the national level, played a tremendous role in building the fabric of western Canada from the railway through to the oil and gas business through to the wheat board and all of the areas that are considered to be the jewels of the west.

Hypothesis: Without the support of the government, the nation wouldn't be nearly as successful

The statement lists all the good things that happened as a result of the government making my statement correct. The model probably had issues with my vague statements.


Context: The Liberal majority disclosed some information contained in the committee report which serves the interests of the federal government and which allowed the Minister of Finance to be in the limelight, to promote his tax reduction initiative and spout propaganda about the federal government's achievements.

Hypothesis: Democrats gave out the information.


Context: What I'm saying is, is that as we promote life and promote a culture of life, surely there are ways we can work together to reduce the number of abortions: continue to promote adoption laws -- it's a great alternative to abortion -- continue to fund and promote maternity group homes; I will continue to promote abstinence programs.

Hypothesis: Abortion and abstinence are different.

It's clearly stated in the paragraph that the two are different.


Context: Now, I don't have time to preside over a deposition at this late date. And I know that you respect that. You're experienced counsel and you know that. I do know from my private practice experience that I was extremely loathed to get a judge on the telephone in mid-deposition. That could be one of the most unhappy experiences that a lawyer would have.

Hypothesis: Speaker is a lawyer

The speaker says they are a lawyer and got a call from a judge in mid-deposition.


Context: The guiding principles contained in the legislation are designed to ensure that the mediator-arbitrator recognizes the directions which have been provided to the employer by the Government of Canada in terms of financial performance and service standards, while at the same time balancing these issues with the importance of good labour relations within the workplace.

Hypothesis: The principles benefited the workers.


Context: Mr. Lessig, on your First Amendment argument I don't see where the retroactivity-prospectivity comes in, because -- I follow your argument under the Copyright Clause, but if you're saying that the time is too long, the public domain should get this stuff sooner rather than later, would you explain to me how your prospectivity-retrospective line fits into your First Amendment claim?

Hypothesis: Mr. Lessig made an argument which was predicated on a US founding document

This is described in the statement, the system does not know what the constitution is


Context: There is an enormous amount of work that goes on in committees when members put aside some of their partisanship and focus on how to build an excellent health care system, on how to build a good research and development program and how to deal with issues of equity when you are looking at issues of debt reduction.

Hypothesis: For the greater good the group should put aside their differences so they can get work done

The speaker suggests that groups will get work done if they put aside their differences. This makes my statement correct. The model was probably fooled by my vague word choices


Context: The bill relates specifically to the fact that under the current provisions of the legislation, if a bill arrives in the hands of a member or a candidate following the election, if it was not received within the required time period in which a candidate or his or her official agent may pay the bill, the only process available now to the member to be able to pay that bill is to get a court order allowing that to happen.

Hypothesis: The bill is something real


Context: In lending support to what the previous speaker from Peterborough said to a grassroots movement, we are recognizing that the insanity of land mines and the insanity of war that maims hundreds of thousands, indeed millions of people, is something that we must stop and work against.

Hypothesis: The speaker was against fighting

The speaker was definitely against fighting as he was against war


Context: For three days we joined the anniversary trail ride commemorating the 1874 march west of the original North West Mounted Police contingent; a great adventure which originally took 275 officers and men from Fort Dufferin south of Winnipeg all through the southern part of Saskatchewan and southern Alberta to Fort Whoop-Up 125 years before.

Hypothesis: The trail ride took people from one fort to another commemorating a similar march in 1874.

The adventure took 275 officers and men from Fort Dufferin to Fort Whoop-Up and the text implies someone was joining an anniversary commemorating it.