Context: How to bond a pair of conures<br>Raise the birds together from an early age. If two conures are both relatively young (less than one year old) and have already been weaned, they can probably be placed together in a cage immediately. When the birds are raised together, they are more likely to think of each other as partners and companions.

Hypothesis: In order to easily bond a pair of conures (a type of bird), they must never share the same cage, whether the cage be rather large or small.

In order to bond conures they must be put in the same cage, so my statement was incorrect


Context: How to avoid alcoholism<br>Keep alcohol out of your house. It's a lot easier for alcohol to become a daily, insidious habit if you always keep it within reach. If your liquor cabinet is always stocked, you can easily be tempted.

Hypothesis: In order to avoid alcoholism you have to keep alcohol out of sight, so it is best if you hide it in your house so it is within reach but always out of sight

You have to keep alcohol out of reach, my statement said that you have to keep it within reach, so my statement is wrong


Context: How to protect roses in the winter<br>Reduce water and fertilizer 6 weeks before the first frost. This is a popular technique among rose gardeners, known as " hardening off. " reduce the water by half and stop fertilizing altogether to help prepare your roses for the cold weather.

Hypothesis: This is for indoor roses.

Reason:  Indoor roses don't need to be prepared for winter; they grow all year.  Why:  It's never explicitly mentioned in the context.


Context: How to make korean sweet potato cake<br>Fill a medium sized stock, soup or multi-cooking pot with 1.5 lbs of korean sweet potatoes (unpeeled). Cover with already hot water (to speed up the boiling process) so that the korean sweet potatoes are resting about one inch below the surface. Bring korean sweet potatoes to a boil and let cook for 25 minutes.

Hypothesis: The potatoes should should rest one inch below the surface of the pot.

The water is supposed to be one inch below the surface, not the potatoes. The system likely didn't recognize the values and their corresponding items were switched.


Context: How to change a page to landscape on microsoft word on pc or mac<br>Open the document in microsoft word. You can do this by double-clicking the document on your computer. [substeps] Alternatively, open microsoft word first (under all apps in the start menu on windows, or in the applications folder on macos), then open the document.

Hypothesis: Microsoft word only allows you to have your page in landscape mode.

It talks about switching it to landscape mode. If it only allows you to have it in landscape mode, then you would never need to switch it because it would always be that mode. Since you can witch it it means that there is another mode.


Context: How to make a cute buildabearville person<br>Bear in mind you're going to need more bearbills, especially if you have just created an account. Try playing the friendship forest photo safari game. Also collect a 100 bb at the sports centre.

Hypothesis: the person gives twenty different ways to create a cute avatar

the speaker does not give their audience twenty different ways to create an avatar making this statement incorrect.


Context: How to drain a dishwasher<br>Remove the dishes from the dishwasher and place them in the kitchen sink. [substeps] You won't be able to take apart certain parts of the dishwasher to see if there are any problems if there are dishes in the way. Make sure you store any sharp knives where they are easily seen, so someone doesn't reach into the sink and cut themselves.

Hypothesis: Move the dishes to a different spot inside the dishwasher.

The statement said to move the dishes out of the dishwsher, not keep them inside.


Context: How to remove ads from pandora<br>Install the adblock plus extension in your web browser of choice. Your browser will be automatically detected and displayed in the " install " button on the website. [substeps] In order to use ad blocking software on a mobile device, you must first root or jailbreak it.

Hypothesis: Ad blocking software never successfully installs on an iPhone.

The context says ad blocking software can be installed on a jailbroken iPhone.


Context: The key is of course in the words of section 93 which are rooted in 19th century history and, to some extent of course, in 18th century history because that is where these particular provisions flowed from, the capitulations of 1759, the Treaty of Paris of 1763 and the Quebec Act of 1774.

Hypothesis: the key is course in words of section 93 which gives the details of treaty of paris of 1763

the 18th century deals the treaty of paris ,quebec act and capitulations of 1759


Context: These issues were not included in Bill C-2 for a variety of reasons - either because they went beyond the scope of the latest CPP statutory review or because they were raised too late in the review, or after the public consultations were complete, which would make it impossible for them to be adequately analyzed and considered.

Hypothesis: The issues were not included in the Bill C- (Sum of 10-8)

The sum you get when you do 10-8 is 2, the bill number!


Context: Could we then go back to Justice O'Connor's question? To make that very specific, if we agree with you, does that mean that we would, in principle, have to hold the 1976 extension unconstitutional? I mean, in 1976, Congress extended the term from 28 years renewable once, to life of the author plus 50 years. Now they're extending it life of the author plus 70. If the latter is unconstitutional on your theory, how could the former not be? And if the former is, the chaos that would ensue would be horrendous.

Hypothesis: O'connor is on the supreme court


Context: Present in chambers are counsel for both the plaintiffs and the defendants, and in addition to that, let me ask that you enter your appearances specially, presumably as counsel for the individuals we referred to in our orders collectively as "reporters."

Hypothesis: plaintiffs are the offensive for a case

plaintiffs are the ones who initiate a case


Context: As you see, I'm far more genial than I express in writing. What I invited by that opinion, though, was that I would be available -- and I believe in an issue that is as important to the reporters and to you, as their counsel, as this, it is appropriate for you to stop a deposition on a question like that, instruct your witness not to answer, and allow the Court to rule on it. I was inviting you to do that. Now, I understand what your reasons are for not doing that, and I think you can do that.

Hypothesis: Court contains an o


Context: What I was really making reference to was when a physician perhaps in Quebec or a physician in the maritimes or a physician out west may make an advance or a discovery in terms of service delivery, there is no system in place right now throughout the country where there is an exchange of this type of information.

Hypothesis: The main topic of this text is not religions.

The main topic is a lack of communication system, and religions are not mentioned at all. It's difficult because asking the AI to find the "main topic" of a text is probably quite difficult.


Context: Honourable senators, I see today in this chamber former premiers, former ministers of the Crown, party leaders, members of the federal and provincial legislatures; business leaders, bankers, financiers, administrators, bureaucrats; professionals in the fields of health, education, law, communications, tourism, agriculture and natural resources, with the very recent addition of a nun.

Hypothesis: The speaker neglected to mention former professionals in the field of engineering as among those they see

Engineers are not brought up at all. I think the system got it wrong because the statement requires noticing a negative


Context: I think we need to have clean coal technologies. I propose $2 billion worth. By the way, I just found out the other day an interesting fact, that there is a national petroleum reserve right next to -- in Prudhoe Bay that your administration opened up for exploration in that pristine area.

Hypothesis: Coal is what they want to put money in


Context: I have no problem with the people on welfare having an opportunity for a job, but I do not agree with the fact that the government, because of problems due to its changes to employment insurance, takes people and, to get them off welfare because changes to employment insurance have resulted in an increase in the number of people on welfare, and sends them working in order to get them on employment insurance and off the provincial rolls.

Hypothesis: Changes to employment insurance by the government had unforeseen consequences.

The text states the government made changes to employment insurance that increased the number of people on welfare.


Context: Biotechnology, in Montreal essentially, was established with the assistance, the indefeasible support of the Canadian government and of my colleague in industry, especially through the creation of the biotechnology research institute, which gave a lift to biotechnology in Montreal.

Hypothesis: the research institute was built in Canada

The institute was built in Montreal which is in Canada


Context: More often than not, this chamber has had quite a few empty seats on the day Royal Assent is given, which leads me to conclude that it is something which is not as attractive to senators as proceedings on another day would be and which would allow them to be in attendance in larger numbers.

Hypothesis: Senators may sit in the seats in this chamber.

The implication is that the seats are for senators, so when the senators don't attend, there are empty seats. The model missed this inference.


Context: In response to the third point made by the Honourable Senator Roche, which is about Canada's role in the entire area, the Minister of Foreign Affairs has said there is a three-fold response: securing agreement to an updated five-year action program with new, concrete objectives for disarmament and non-proliferation; seeking a more robust review and assessment process to give full meaning to the principle of permanence with accountability; and promoting universal adherence to the NPT, with renewed commitment by treaty member states to live up to their obligations.

Hypothesis: The minister implied that a two year action program would not achieve the countries objective in this area

The proposal was for a five year plan, implying a two year plan would be inadequate.


Context: Oh, yes. There were not many meetings where Bill Buckingham did not speak. And, actually, at that meeting -- I believe the beginning of the meeting was an apology, actually, which he had prepared in advance apologizing to the members of the community if he had said anything that offended them.

Hypothesis: Buckingham is his last name.

His name is Bill Buckingham. The system was confused by the context.


Context: It might also publisher -- what the publisher pays for your prospective work, Justice Breyer. We -- the Copyright Clause incentive provides incentives not just for -- not just to the creators, but to the disseminators, the publishers, the broadcasters, the film companies.

Hypothesis: The broadcasters are entitled to compensation

The broadcasters get compensation if there is a copyright breech just like the creators would. This is the incentive they are speaking of.


Context: That he will call the attention of the Senate to the vacancy in the Senate created by the retirement of the Honourable Richard Doyle of Ontario; to the long-standing tradition of appointing a senior journalist from Ontario to the Senate; and to some helpful suggestions for the Prime Minister in this regard.

Hypothesis: This deals with the parliament of the country to the North of the USA

Ontario is in Canada. This deals with senate or a parliament.


Context: On Monday, October 11, 1993, on the night of Thanksgiving Day, and a few weeks before the election, I had the honour, the pleasure and the privilege of representing my party during a public debate that was carried by Radio-Canada in the Quebec region from Portneuf to the Magdalen Islands, including Gasp, Sept-les and the greater Quebec City region.

Hypothesis: There was a debate in ninteen ninty three on thanksgiving night

by spelling out the year I suppose that is what confused the AI


Context: Well, there was an interest in having a uniform rule, and that's precisely why the Framers created the Copyright Clause in the Constitution, but there was copyright protection in some States, there wasn't copyright protection in other States, and what we know from the decision of this Court in the Wheaton decision is that there was not a common law copyright in existence. This Court explicitly held that. Now, the petitioners make this quid pro quo to draw the line as well as in how long a line

Hypothesis: The framers created the copyright clause in the constitution because of the demand.

The Framers created the copyright clause in the constitution because there was interest (a demand) in having a uniform ruling. The system likely interpreted demand as meaning a forceful request rather than the the context of a need for something to be supplied (e.g. there was a demand for concert tickets)


Context: Whereas I have no objection in some instances here and there for some of those votes being referred to some committees, I would not like to see it become a routine practice of this place that as soon as the Estimates arrive here, these various votes are referred to other committees.

Hypothesis: the agent has no objection


Context: They are not happy about the lack of jobs, the rising cost of post-secondary education, the dismantling of the health care system, the price of grain as announced recently by the Canadian Wheat Board, the cost of transporting farm products to market, the political manipulation of the grain transportation system over the last 40 years, an ineffective Young Offenders Act, and the lack of justice in that criminals appear to have more rights than law-abiding citizens.

Hypothesis: Who gets more justice is a perception not a solid fact.

The system may have assumed appears is a concrete term, while it infers a perception not an actual reality.


Context: It had the opportunity and has already done so many times in the Criminal Code with respect to the environment, but it wants to carry this even a little further with standards, objectives and mostly, the need to honour international agreements or international commitments made by Canada.

Hypothesis: Canada doesn't want to let down other countries with there commitments

It says that Canada has the want to honor there commitments


Context: When the Corporation makes a decision to significantly reduce operations at a given location, there will be no layoffs, terminations or salary reductions for STRF and NABET employees who were on strength as of December 31, 1983 and who are still employed on the date of signature of this collective agreement, provided they have completed their probationary period.

Hypothesis: Some months have at least 30 days.

If something occurred on December 31, then that means some months have at least 30 days, meaning the statement is definitely correct.


Context: I agree with that. I agree with that. I think that one of the problems that we have faced in the world is that we are so much more powerful than any single nation has been in relationship to the rest of the world than at any time in history, that I know about, anyway.

Hypothesis: The agent agreed twice.

the agent said I agree twice so it is correct but the AI was not able to really process the meaning of the statement so marked it neither.


Context: When we were making the case for Triumph, the $167.5 million grant to the University of British Columbia base research in folic physics and particle physics, one had to explain what this was about, but the most telling argument was the spin-off in high talent, high intelligence based industries in British Columbia.

The Statement says that there is a University of British Columbia, therefore it is definitely correct to say "It is wrong to say that British Columbia has no University."


Context: He came to care about the Senate, but he has deep concerns about its viability in its present form, concerns which he expressed in a very fine speech in February of 1998. He challenged all of us to work together constructively for change, both constitutional change and internal change.

Hypothesis: he wanted us to work together for a better future

this statement is correct because the text says he wanted change and i think the system had trouble with this because I used the word future


Context: The first priority has to be on ending the violence, dampening down the tensions that have arisen there. We need to call upon Syria to release the three Israeli soldiers who have been captured. We need to insist that Arafat send out instructions to halt some of the provocative acts of violence that have been going on.

Hypothesis: Syria needs to release exactly three soldiers.

We need to call upon Syria to release the three Israeli soldiers. The system was confused by the wording.


Context: There is something illogical about this, and members will understand that, when one sees the Department of Justice spending the $193 million it will be getting via supply, why the Bloc Quebecois cannot agree with this, given that these monies are mismanaged and misspent by a minister concerned only with raising her profile and getting easy votes in the west.

Hypothesis: The agent feels that it is not appropriate for the person to spend the money in such a way as to simply ensure getting more votes.

The agent references in the passage that the person misspent the money in order to get more votes in the west.  It is unknown why the system did not pick up on this.


Context: It is this Canadian genius that guided the Government of Canada in the creation of the national child benefit program, the establishment of the Canada millennium scholarship fund, the restoration of $11.5 billion transfer payments for medicare and the increase in the budget for research, innovation and development.

Hypothesis: The budge for research, innovation and development was lower before

It increased. I think the system got it wrong because the statement requires an inference


Context: And I don't want there to be a misunderstanding in terms as to this case being wrongly focused. And what I mean by that, with regard to all of you in this room is that we've got approximately 40 people from the media that are observing this trial in the courtroom, plus outside of the courtroom.

Hypothesis: The reporters are observing the trial and courtroom avidly.

There are 40 reporters there, they are very interested in this trial.


Context: "This letter is in regard to the comments made by Beth Eveland from York Township in the June York Sunday News. I assure you that the Dover Area School Board is not going against its mission statement. In fact, if you read the statement, it says to educate our students so that they can be contributing members of society.

Hypothesis: Beth's last name is Eveland.

According to the statement, Beth's last name is Eveland, which is why she is called Beth Eveland.


Context: We're pleased to see that under Bill C-43, the Minister of Revenue will retain responsibility for this Agency and it will be structured to allow for close Ministerial oversight and, in particular, that the Minister's power of inquiry into any activity of the Agency will be maintained.

Hypothesis: They are not talking about Bill C-44 in this text.

They're talking about Bill C-43, not Bill C-44, so this is definitely correct. I'm not sure why this was difficult.


Context: I do, I do. The Persian Gulf, obviously. And Bosnia. And you have already talked about Kosovo. But the reverse side of the question, Governor, that Vice President Gore mentioned, 600,000 people died in Rwanda in 1994. There was no U.S. intervention, no intervention from the outside world. Was that a mistake not to intervene?

Hypothesis: The interviewer agrees with the governor's opinion on Bosnia.

The statement "I do, I do." ...."But the reverse side of the question" means that the interviewer agrees with previous statements made in relation to Bosnia and the Persian Gulf but is now about to challenge a different topic.


Context: I do. I do think this, though. When it comes to timetables it can't be the United States timetable as to how discussions take place. It's got to be a timetable that all parties can agree to, like the Palestinians and Israelis. Secondly, any lasting peace is going to have to be a peace that's good for both sides. And therefore, the term honest broker makes sense. This current administration's worked hard to keep the parties at the table. I will try to do the same thing. But it won't be on my timetable, it will be on the timetable that people are comfortable with in the Middle East.

Hypothesis: The author wants to make sure everyone gets along.

The author has said that it has to be based on everyone not just the united states. The system doesn't read between the line.


Context: In all due respect, I'm not so sure it's credible to quote leading news organizations about -- oh, never mind. Anyway, let me quote the Lewin report. The Lewin report is a group of folks who are not politically affiliated. They analyzed the senator's plan. It cost $1.2 trillion.

Hypothesis: The senator's plan is in US dollars

The senator is presumably American, and his plan would be in American dollars


Context: Justice Breyer, under our theory as we've advanced it, you're right; the 1976 act would be unconstitutional. Whether this Court would apply such a holding in this case to that act is a question that would have to be resolved under the retrospective --

Hypothesis: Not only Justice Breyer thinks the 1976 act would be unconstitutional.

Justice Breyer agrees with the person they are speaking too in the text about the act. I think the system has a hard time telling Justice is speaking to someone.


Context: That's not smart. I don't want American workers subsidizing the loss of their own job. And when I'm president, we're going to shut that loophole in a nanosecond and we're going to use that money to lower corporate tax rates in America for all corporations, 5 percent. And we're going to have a manufacturing jobs credit and a job hiring credit so we actually help people be able to hire here.

Hypothesis: American workers make businesses money


Context: They call on parliament to amend the Criminal Code to ensure the right of all Canadians to die with dignity by allowing people with terminal, irreversible or debilitating illness the right to the assistance of a physician in ending their lives at a time of their choice, subject to six strict safeguards to prevent abuse and to ensure that the decision is free, informed, competent and voluntary.

Hypothesis: They call on parliament to amend the Criminal Code to ensure the right of all Canadians to die with dignity by allowing people with terminal, irreversible or debilitating illness the right to the assistance of a physician in ending their lives. This is called euthanasia.


Context: That's got to mean something, and if it means that we are limited in our ability to agree with the Europeans as they continually expand the term in light of their own vision of what copyright is about, then that's the meaning of a constitutional restriction.

Hypothesis: it is the meaning of constitutional restriction

The message states "that's the meaning of a constitutional restriction"


Context: That is speaking about as directly as I can to Motions Nos. 9 and 10. By tabling regulations in parliament and having the House of Commons or a committee subsequently pass them, we want to make sure an effective check is placed on ministers or departmental officials in terms of a bill to arbitrarily implement changes in the legislation.

Hypothesis: effective checks are necessary according to the speaker

the speaker is definitely speaking about effective checks needing to be in place. I think the AI didn't know he was speaking about the checks?


Context: I submit, Justice Souter, that there's no per se limitation, that if there is, as Justice Scalia suggested, for -- if it is true that Congress,having specified 14 years or 28 years, decides that doesn't work very well because of the economies of other countries, the parade of constraints on artists in other countries, the reasons that we want things to be preserved or distributed, it should be 2 more years, or 5 more years later --

Hypothesis: Less than 30 Justices are mentioned in the text.

It's definitely correct because only two Justices are mentioned in the text, and 2 is less than 30. It's difficult because the system seems to get confused with large numbers like this.


Context: Having a hemisphere that is free for trade and peaceful is in our nation's interests. Strong relations in Europe is in our nation's interest. I've thought a lot about what it means to be the president. I also understand that an administration is not one person, but an administration is dedicated citizens who are called by the president to serve the country, to serve a cause greater than self, and so I've thought about an administration of people who represent all America, but people who understand my compassionate and conservative philosophy.

Hypothesis: The president believes that it takes a lot of people to run an administration.

This is correct because the context states "that an administration is not on person, but an administration is dedicated citizens who are called". Therefore the president believes it takes a lot of people to run the administration.


Context: New question. Last question. For you, Governor. And this flows somewhat out of the Boston debate. You, your running mate, your campaign officials have charged that Vice President Gore exaggerates, embellishes and stretches the facts, etcetera. Are you -- do you believe these are serious issues? This is a serious issue that the voters should use in deciding which one of you two men to vote for on November 7?

Hypothesis: the Vice President exaggerates the truth.

it says "Vice President Gore exaggerates, embellishes and stretches the facts." I think the system couldn't synonymize  truth and facts.


Context: None of us will forget the images of sumo wrestlers stomping to drive out demons as the games began, of the glorious Ode to Joy and mass choirs and choruses around the world, of starry-night closing ceremonies and flower-laden horses, of floodlights dimming and thousands of paper lanterns becoming a shimmering sea of light.

Hypothesis: Stomping of sumo wrestlers is ceremonial

The paragraph states that the stomping is to drive out demons


Context: I am pleased to speak on this motion today, particularly since I drafted it two years ago as a result of some unfortunate circumstances in my home province of Saskatchewan but which could continue to have some importance as efforts to discover the extent of government's involvement in the APEC issue unfold.

Hypothesis: The narrator is canadian

He mentions his home providence of Saskatchewan which is in Canada


Context: General Olson has been perfectly clear in setting out the structure of the Government's argument. It is that there is no effective limit on Congress's power under the Copyright Clause. Now, were this the first time this Court had considered Congress's copyright authority, that might be a plausible argument, but the very first time this Court ever struck down a law of Congress as exceeding Article I, section 8 power was in the context of the Copyright Clause.

Hypothesis: The original law was snubbed.

snubbed also means turned down so it is correct but the AI did not relate the two meanings.


Context: There were a couple instances where friends of mine had tried to check on the status of the books in the library but were not permitted to go in at that time. So I am only assuming that those books are there now because I am being told that they are. But as for myself walking into a library and seeing them there, I did not.

Hypothesis: The agent hasn't viewed the books in question

The agens states- But as for myself walking into a library and seeing them there, I did not.


Context: I too am very pleased to hear about the Bloc Quebecois' respect for the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, particularly when, on September 29, 1994, the Deputy Premier of Quebec made a statement concerning a government employee to the effect that ``A diplomat representing Quebec abroad who is unable to present the aspect of Quebec reality that is our path toward sovereignty is not qualified for his job''.

Hypothesis: The Deputy Premier of Quebec is concerned.

The Deputy made a statement concerning that a diplomat may not be qualified for his job.


Context: They leave all civility, take a cowardly gun and go to the neighbour's farmhouse, whose cousin is married to theirs, then murder the boy who could become a soldier, humiliate and renounce all sense of community, burn the home, steal the livestock, take any money from the victims and send the remaining souls, having lost all, on a foot journey into the unknown.

Hypothesis: events are related.


Context: In the negotiations over the past two years, it is understandable that table 2 union members had no hesitation using their right to strike, which they had obtained on December 16, 1998. So, in a perfectly legal context, the union is exercising its means of pressure by holding rotating strikes across the country since January 18.

Hypothesis: The table 2 union was founded in 1991.

Nothing is mentioned in the text as to when exactly the union was formed, so we don't know. It's difficult because 1998 is mentioned in the text, which probably confused the system.


Context: Can I say, if I could just say a word about a woman that you didn't ask about, but my mom passed away a couple years ago, just before I was deciding to run. And she was in the hospital, and I went in to talk to her and tell her what I was thinking of doing.

Hypothesis: I decided to run after my mother passed away.

There is no specific confirmation that the speaker decided to run.


Context: In The Toronto Star, the story is that, before the offending letter was sent off to Swiss authorities, it went back and forth several times between Staff Sergeant Fiegenwald and the Justice Department lawyer Kimberly Prost, each time resulting in the Justice Department toughening the language.

Hypothesis: The Toronto Star rarely consults the Swiss authorities.

We do not know how often The Toronto Star works with Swiss authorities.


Context: For example: to have diplomatic initiatives to diffuse the tensions between ethnic groups and encourage peacekeeping initiatives between these rival groups; to introduce positive information to counter the negative information that is being spread; to have an international arms registry that deals with specific arms, which would go a long way to adding a measure of transparency and accountability where there are military organizations.

Hypothesis: diplomatic initiatives help to diffuse the tensions between ethnic groups

The context states that diplomatic initiatives would add a measure of transparency and accountability but it doesn't state that they are actually successful in diffusing tensions. The system could likely not understand that nowhere does it report on the efficacy of the diplomatic initiatives.


Context: Well, I'm not for photo licensing. Let me say something about Columbine. Listen, we've got gun laws. He says we ought to have gun-free schools. Everybody believes that. I'm sure every state in the union has got them. You can't carry a gun into a school. And there ought to be a consequence when you do carry a gun into a school.

Hypothesis: allowing guns into schools would increase safety

there is no way to know if allowing more guns in schools would make them more safe


Context: And I think to answer your question, I think both of us care a lot about the environment. We may have different approaches. We may have different approaches in terms of how we deal with local folks. I just cited an example of the administration just unilaterally acting without any input.

Hypothesis: I will answer your question

It is not stated clearly in the phhrase.


Context: So we've got to enforce our civil rights laws. We've got to deal with things like racial profiling. And we have to keep our military strong. We have the strongest military, and I'll do whatever is necessary, if I'm president, to make sure that it stays that way.

Hypothesis: Enforcing civil rights laws will help us have the strongest military.

It doesn't say that & there's no way to know that by the context.


Context: Now, there's more work to do. Remains to be seen, however, whether or not there's going to be a political settlement in Kosovo, and I certainly hope there is one. Also on record as saying at some point in time I hope our European friends become the peacekeepers in Bosnia and in the Balkans.

Hypothesis: There will be a political settlement in Kosovo with in the next two weeks.

The statement doesnt say when there will be a political settlement.  Dont know what the system thinks its incorrect.


Context: I would agree. And I also agree that most police officers, of course, are doing a good job and hate this practice also. I talked to an African-American police officer in Springfield, Massachusetts not long ago who raised this question and said that in his opinion one of the biggest solutions is in the training.

It's impossible to know based on the statement if Springfield, Massachusetts has mainly white cops in its police force.


Context: You will note, honourable senators, that I am not following the Reform line of putting a lowered debt as a priority, because the economic growth that is so necessary for more jobs is better assured by a drop in taxes and charges against total payrolls, and because the debt-to-GDP ratio will probably drop to 63 per cent within three years.

Hypothesis: Driving  airstreams, riding motorcyles, drinking whiskey in the next three will payback debt

All the following airstreamers, Harley Davidson, and Jack Daniel are all american made products. There the more consumers buy these product the lower the debt-to-GDP will drop.


Context: A Member is doing something inherently connected with a ``proceeding in Parliament'' when putting down a question on the Order Paper, a notice of motion, a notice of motion for the production of papers, or a report stage amendment; when obtaining assistance to do any of these; or when obtaining assistance to draft a bill.

Hypothesis: The Order Paper is not actually written in paper

It's unknown if the Order Paper is stored electronically or on paper


Context: Members of the federal government team most active in implementing Gathering Strength include the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, Canadian Heritage, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Health Canada, Human Resources and Development Canada, Industry Canada, Department of Justice, Natural Resources Canada, Solicitor General and Statistics Canada.

Hypothesis: The Department of Indian Affairs has no Cherokee.

It doesn't tell if there are any Cherokee Indians on the DIA. The statement could be true or not.


Context: Honourable senators, pursuant to rule 23(6), and on behalf of Senator Hays, I have the honour to present, in both official languages, the report of the Canadian delegation of the Canada-Japan Interparliamentary Group to the seventh annual meeting of the Asia-Pacific Parliamentary Forum which took place in Lima, Peru from January 11 to 14, 1999.

Hypothesis: The seventh annual meeting of the Asia-Pacific Forum did not not occur while it was raining.

The context has nothing to do with it raining, therefore it is neither.


Context: It is quite unfortunate that some members of this House feel they have a hierarchy that is higher than the ordinary Canadian, better than most members of Parliament, that they are in a preferred category of having the ideologies that speak better to all Canadians than other members.

Hypothesis: Canadians are put in ice floes to die when they retire.

We do not know from the context whether or not Canadians are put in ice floes to die when they retire, so the statement is neither definitely correct nor definitely incorrect.


Context: These debates are sponsored by the Commission on Presidential Debates. The format and the rules are those negotiated by representatives of the two campaigns. Only the subjects tonight and the questions are mine. The format tonight is that of a conversation.

Hypothesis: The debates are between candidates of the same party.

The text doesn't say what party the "two campaigns" represent. The model assumed they were from different parties.


Context: Well, the issue before this Court, I hasten to say, as I said before, is only whether, once the Congress makes that judgment, it can ever change it retrospectively. The issue before this Court is not whether, in the future, a certain length of time would be appropriate.

Hypothesis: Congress will change the decision of a judgement without considering when the decision was made.

The statement is referring to the question if Congress can change their judgement after it is made, the time frame and if allowed is not clear.


Context: A headline in the local paper stated that the Health Canada scientists, who you had mentioned earlier in your speech had taken affidavits in order to be able to talk, had been gagged by the department over their protest and will likely be under gag order for the rest of their careers, despite a Senate promise to keep an eye on Health Canada's management problems.

Hypothesis: Health Canada has fixed their management problems.

It is clear from the text that Health Canada had prior management problems, but it is not clear if those problems have been fixed or not.  I am not sure why the system did not understand this.


Context: Justice Breyer, under our theory as we've advanced it, you're right; the 1976 act would be unconstitutional. Whether this Court would apply such a holding in this case to that act is a question that would have to be resolved under the retrospective --

Hypothesis: This hearing was in the 90s


Context: When they try to hurt us, they are hurting themselves, because now we can talk about committees, such as the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development, the Standing Committee on Finance, the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Trade, the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights, and the Standing Committee on Health.

Hypothesis: The people who believe in human rights don't work for the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights

Eventhough they don't believe in human rights, they could still work in the committee, you don't have to believe in something to work for it.


Context: Let me just tell you who the jury is. The people of Texas. There's only been one governor ever elected to back-to-back four-year terms, and that was me. And I was able to do so with a lot of Democrat votes, nearly 50% of the Hispanic vote, about 27% of the African-American vote, because people know I'm a conservative person and a compassionate person.

Hypothesis: The person elected for back to back four year terms was George W. Bush.

The speaker of the passage was never revealed. It could be this person, or it could not be this person. The system probably wanted to make a binary classification where there wasn't one.


Context: In response to the third point made by the Honourable Senator Roche, which is about Canada's role in the entire area, the Minister of Foreign Affairs has said there is a three-fold response: securing agreement to an updated five-year action program with new, concrete objectives for disarmament and non-proliferation; seeking a more robust review and assessment process to give full meaning to the principle of permanence with accountability; and promoting universal adherence to the NPT, with renewed commitment by treaty member states to live up to their obligations.

Hypothesis: The US government has no comment on the matter.

Based on the context the statement "The US government has no comment on the matter" could be correct, or not correct..I'm not exactly sure why it was difficult for the system..


Context: General Olson, you say that the functional equivalent of an unlimited time would be a violation, but that's precisely the argument that's being made by petitioners here, that a limited time which is extendable is the functionable, functional equivalent of an unlimited time, a limited time that 10 years from now can be extended, and then extended again, and extended again. Why -- their argument is precisely that, a limited time doesn't mean anything unless it means, once you have established the limit for works that have been created under that limit, that's the end.

Hypothesis: General Olson has three middle names.

We do not know how many middle names General Olson has, if any, so the statement is neither definitely correct nor definitely incorrect.


Context: Tonight the topic will be domestic affairs, but the format will be the same as that first debate. I'll moderate our discussion under detailed rules agreed to by the candidates, but the questions and the areas to be covered were chosen by me. I have not told the candidates or anyone else what they are.

Hypothesis: the candidates or anyone else  know what they are in the office.

I have not told the candidates or anyone else what they are. By adding the word to the office we don't know if they know or not what they are in the office, so the statement could be neither definitely correct nor definitely incorrect


Context: This Court's interpretation of "limited times" could, of course, eviscerate that term of any meaning, but under the principle of enumeration as this Court has articulated it, this Court should interpret that clause in a way that gives its terms effect in a simple way.

Hypothesis: limited times was interpreted by amy


Context: Judge, if I may, there are some things here that we can agree with, but there are others that we can't. And this is why, in our opinion, Judge. You know, if our clients are believed, the reporters did talk to them but took misrepresentative statements so that they left things out to put them in a false light and in so doing have created articles that, if they were admitted for the truth of the matter asserted, would be misrepresentative.

Hypothesis: Judge has made a sentence kenny


Context: The wrong impression that many have is that somehow through some sanctions a person will be brought into court if their child has been accused or is being charged with an offence before the courts and that somehow the courts will actually be able to hold the parent or guardian accountable.

Hypothesis: Children can be given the death penalty.

It is unclear if children can be given the death penalty. The system was confused by the context.


Context: The Liberal member who just spoke is not going to support this bill and it really puzzles me why a member of the government, not just a member of the House, would stand up in this place, look the Canadian public in the eye by way of the television camera and say ``I will not support your having access to information about how we spend your tax dollars''.

Hypothesis: Most liberal members support the bill.

This must be neither correct or incorrect as we do not know the political affiliation of the person providing the context nor do we know whether the other members of the liberal party are for or against the measure.


Context: In this regard, the Bloc Quebecois would have preferred that the Export Development Corporation draw more on the very simple and probably more effective operational framework of the World Bank or the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, since they require, for each sensitive project in a sensitive area, an impact study, public hearings and most importantly process transparency.

Hypothesis: Bloc Quebecois will no longer express his preferences when the World Bank is involved.

We have no clue whether Bloc will or will not express his preferences when the World Bank is involved. Not sure how this fooled the AI system.


Context: In this case, the change agreed to between the Department of Canadian Heritage and the department concerned takes precedence over other regulations under the Fisheries Act, the Coastal Fisheries Protection Act, the Canada Shipping Act, the Arctic Waters Pollution Prevention Act, the Navigable Waters Protection Act or the Aeronautics Act.

Hypothesis: The case doesn't matter at teh end of the day.

It matters because it makes a changes to several acts.


Context: Justice Breyer, it's conceivable that the Court might do that if that situation was present, but it's not remotely the situation here. We have the adoption of copyright terms which are consistent, generally speaking, with copyright terms which exist in the European Union, our principal competitor, and in connection with international treaties.

Hypothesis: Copyright terms are the same all over the world.

The wording that I chose and the fact that the text refers to the European Union made it difficult for the system.


Context: The best way to take the pressure off our troops is to succeed in Iraq, is to train Iraqis so they can do the hard work of democracy, is to give them a chance to defend their country, which is precisely what we're doing. We'll have 125,000 troops trained by the end of this year.

Hypothesis: Success in Iraq will certainly ease the pressure on the troops.

The context is an assumption and the system nor the speaker can assume it to be totally right or wrong.


Context: At this milestone in our history, I encourage honourable senators to reflect on the events of December 6, 1989, and to do what you can to ensure that we have -and to the extent that we have not, that we strive to have - a society where there is respect and harmony between men and women.

Hypothesis: Senators have put a lot of effort to ensure respect and harmony between men and women before December 6, 1989.

We don't know about the efforts of senators about the respect and harmony between men and women before that date.


Context: When your counsel asks you the question, you may review the article, take a look at it, see if it refreshes your recollection. It's important that having refreshed your recollection, if it jogs something or re-creates a memory, that you testify in answer to Mr. Harvey's question. Do not look back and read from the article as you're testifying, please. All right?

Hypothesis: The person on the stand is lying.

No information is given regarding the honesty of the person on the stand.


Context: Honourable senators, I am somewhat hesitant, even humbled, to introduce my rather technical subject after listening to the learned debate this afternoon on Bill C-20. The quality of the debate has been unusually high and fascinating, given the nature of the subject matter - the very survival of our great nation.

Hypothesis: The senators don't want to hear what this speaker has to say.

There is no mention about this which make it neither correct nor incorrect.


Context: The best people to watch over the quality of our health care system are not the hon. members of the Liberal Party, but the citizens who, along with the various provinces, will put pressure on the government and their local representatives who are involved in the health care system.

Hypothesis: the conservatives are great people


Context: This week, the Bloc Quebecois presented a motion asking the government for the opportunity to exercise a very democratic right in the House of Commons: the members' right to vote and give the government the mandate to takes its responsibilities in terms of honouring commitments made to NATO.

Hypothesis: Bloc Quebecois members enjoy brunch

There is no way to know if Bloc Quebecois members do or do not enjoy brunch or how many do or do not.


Context: I recall my husband speaking. In fact, he hadn't prepared to speak, but he was very upset, as many people in the audience were, and he stood up to speak. I don't remember his exact comments, but, again, it was a warning to the school board and -actually, not necessarily a warning, but just sort of reiterating what science teachers do in their science classes and how there is really no conflict here with the textbook.

Hypothesis: This was a school board meeting

It is not clear if this was an actual meeting.


Context: What a slap in the face to many of the parents and taxpayers of the Dover area. How sad that a member of our own school board would be so closed-minded and not want to carry on the mission of Dover schools. "His ignorance will not only hold back children attending Dover area schools, but also reinforce other communities' views that Dover is a backwards, close-minded community.

Hypothesis: Dover is located in Colorado.

Nothing in the text mentions where Dover is located so we don't know without using external resources. It's difficult because perhaps the system does know that Dover is not actually in Colorado so it judges the answer to be incorrect even though the text does not explicitly state it to be incorrect.


Context: This government had better be prepared to reinforce the budgets of these institutions that we rely on to protect our security, the security of our industries and the high tech development occurring, to protect those secrets from encroachment and incursion by forces outside of our country that have almost an open door to move across our borders into our country and set up their espionage organizations to take these secrets from our very high tech society in this country and use them against us.

Hypothesis: The government is prepared to reinforce budgets

This statement fits into the neither category, because we know nothing about the actual preparedness of the government from this context. The system may have interpreted the first sentence as the governement not being prepared.


Context: No. We've got one in Texas. And guess what? The three men who murdered James Byrd, guess what's going to happen to them? They're going to be put to death. A jury found them guilty. It's going to be hard to punish them any worse after they get put to death.

Hypothesis: Byrd served jail time.

It is unclear if Byrd served jail time. The system was confused by the context.


Context: First let me just say one comment about what the vice president said. I think one of the lessons in between World War I and World War II is we let our military atrophy. And we can't do that. We've got to rebuild our military. But one of the problems we have in the military is we're in a lot of places around the world.

Hypothesis: The military is ready for World War III.

It is unclear if the military is ready for another world war. The system was confused by the context.


Context: The federal government is talking about looking after home care, community services, strategies for youth, bursaries, pharmacare, ways to interest young people in science, a national school nutrition program, Canada wide benefits for poor children, a Canadian foundation for innovation, and a partridge in a pear tree.

Hypothesis: The government wants to tax people more money

The context states that the government is talking about doing more for the community but does not talk about how they are going to do it. It is not certain that the government will tax people for more money.


Context: You work that out. Let's get back on the record here, because we've got people waiting and I want to get going. You'll have to work that out. But I will tell you in concluding that if it is at night, if you do it at night, I will give you my home number, and you can contact me so we get this finished. If we have to do that, we'll do it so we get it finished. I will not attend the deposition, though. I stopped doing that when I got this job. Anything else?

Hypothesis: The person's job prevents them from attending the deposition.

The text says " I will not attend the deposition, though. I stopped doing that when I got this job." - It isn't clear whether the job prevents it or it's a choice. The model assumed it.


Context: Therefore I am very pleased to indicate to the member that within the next couple of weeks we will make available a service charge calculator free of charge on our website, Strategis, that will enable consumers to compare the charges levied against them by a variety of financial institutions and see in a very transparent and rapid way where the best services charges can be obtained.

Hypothesis: The service charge calculator will be available before next month.

It is correct or incorrect because the calculator will be available in a few weeks, which could be months from now.


Context: That the subcommittee on Corrections and Conditional Release Act be granted authority to travel to Edmonton, Regina and Winnipeg during the week of April 19, 1999, to Kingston and Toronto during the week of May 10, 1999 and to Montreal and region during the week of May 24, 1999 and that the necessary staff accompany it.

Hypothesis: The subcommittee on Corrections and Conditional Release Act members are all alive to this day.

We can't know if the members are alive or deceased. 1999 isn't that long ago so it's possible they are all still alive but equally as possible that some are deceased.


Context: Local control or local input into resource management can be a good thing but it should not be based on anything other than the fact that there are people who are local to the area and who have a vested interest in the decisions that may affect them and may affect the land they are living on.

Hypothesis: Local control is a good thing


Context: The -- as we described in our brief, in pages 34 through 36, I believe it is in our brief, that the concerns about the limitation on exploitation and the limitation of a copyright period in Europe is based upon the country of origin of the work and the shortest time available.

Hypothesis: The concerns are not in the brief.

The text says they believe it is in the brief, it does not state definitively.


Context: But for them, they get the benefit of the longer term if you don't apply it to an existing copyright. I mean, if you say you need 70 years because of changes in the economy to encourage works, you grant 70 for the future, but why does that, making that apply to somebody provided him?

Hypothesis: The amount of years mentioned in the text is higher than 75.

It's definitely incorrect because 70 years is mentioned, and 70 years is not higher than 75 years. I'm not really sure why this was difficult.


Context: Mr. Speaker, just to show how absurd the icebreaking policy is, the ships providing ferry service between Quebec City and Lvis, Baie-Comeau and Matane, and Rivire-du-Loup and Saint-Simon will have to pay icebreaking fees this winter, while federal government vessels and Newfoundland ferries will not.

Hypothesis: Saint-Simon is the speaker of the house.

Saint-Simon is a city or town that is getting ferry service, not a person.


Context: Based upon this possibility and given that the government has wasted almost $1 billion on cancellation fees and will spend much more on lawsuits, will the government attempt to save the Canadian taxpayer a large sum of money by purchasing the same helicopter for both search and rescue and maritime operations - in other words, return to commonality?

Hypothesis: The government has wasted more than $1.01 billion on cancellation fees.

It says they wasted almost $1 billion, which presumably means less than $1 billion, not more than $1.01 billion. It's difficult because the system might not know what "almost" means in this context.


Context: Yes. I grew up in Dover, I attended Dover High School, graduated from Dover High School. My family, my extended family, lives in the Dover area, including my grandparents, my parents, and other relatives. My parents currently still live in the Dover area.

Hypothesis: My grandparents are currently growing up in the Dover area.

The grandparents are already grown adults and were not still growing up in the Dover area.


Context: No child should be left behind in America. I want to make sure we rebuild our military to keep the peace. I worry about morale in today's military. The warning signs are clear. It is time to have a new commander in chief who will rebuild the military, pay our men and women more, make sure they're housed better and have a focused mission for our military.

Hypothesis: Bad kids should be left behind in America.

If no child should be left behind in America, then that also applies to bad kids, so the statement is definitely incorrect.


Context: Well, because there wasn't really a clear resolution to what had occurred the previous meeting. In addition, I was very angry when I left the June 7th meeting just because of the demeanor of the school board and the things that were being said. And, honestly, I thought that maybe it would set me into labor because of, you know, being angry, and at that point in time I was past my due date, in addition to caring about my children's education and everything I said previously.

Hypothesis: The speaker here is a man.

This is false because they are pregnant, so they must be female.


Context: To my students taking a PSSA test, well, you know, I -- being an educator, I'm not in love with PSSA tests or standardized tests. But if you're asking me if I object to my daughter taking a standardized test with that information on it, of course not. I would hope that they would provide lots of academic information on those tests.

Hypothesis: The writer is a parent but not a teacher.

The writer is both a teacher/educator with students AND a parent with a daughter. The model may have been fooled by the BUT statement.


Context: One of the criteria that I think is important in deciding when and if we should ever get involved around the world is whether or not our national security interest is involved, if we can really make the difference with military forces. We tried everything else.

Hypothesis: National security is the lowest priority

The person who wrote it says that it is one of the most important factors. The system got it wrong because it might be a matter of opinion


Context: Okay, and is your argument that we find and hold against their retrospective because there is some, at least plausible basis should so argument, to say that there can be a causal connection between the retrospective extension and some benefit that can be traced to those particular works through the retrospective extension, like dissemination? Is that your argument?

Hypothesis: The argument is clear to the person

The argument is not clear to the person because the are asking a number of questions. If it was clear they wouldn't need to clarify. The system could likely not understand that asking questions equates to not understanding something. Although to note, this particular example was very difficult to understand and read as gibberish.


Context: No. What we were saying is, if Congress wants to permit restoration of films, for example, an issue that's been well briefed here, Congress can say, if you restore the film, then the restoration gets a copyright so long as it satisfies originality as outlined in Feist, and it gets a copyright for a period of time. But this Court's opinion in Graham and in Feist made clear that it could not extend copyrights to works in the public domain. The Government doesn't concede that, but we stand on that as a way of understanding why this Court --

Hypothesis: The discussion is about sponsorship


Context: Mr. Speaker, so the member for Vaudreuil-Soulanges is very concerned that his own party could raise by 20% the number of Air Canada shares owned by a single shareholder, since, according to him, the Caisse de dpt et placement du Qubec could increase its holding of shares of this company to the point of taking control of it.

Hypothesis: Air Canada is owned by a single shareholder.

The system may have seen the phrase in a sentence and ignored the rest of the context.


Context: Justice, we do not believe that the very first act extended terms at all. Speaking technically, which for a lawyer means speaking accurately, the 1790 act did not extend a Federal term. The 1790 act granted a term for works that already existed in precisely the pattern that the English parliament had done in the Statute of Anne in 1710, and that the English parliament did with monopolies, general monopolies in the statute.

Hypothesis: The English parliament mentions the game monopoly

It mentions monopoly, not the game monopoly


Context: I'm not sure what kind of view he's describing to me. I can just tell you, I'm a person who respects other people. I respect their -- I respect -- on the one hand he says he agrees with me and then he says he doesn't. I'm not sure where he's coming from. But I will be a tolerant person. I've been a tolerant person all my life. I just happen to believe strongly that marriage is between a man and a woman.

Hypothesis: The topic is evolution in this conversation

the topic appears to be about the sanctity of marriage


Context: He came to care about the Senate, but he has deep concerns about its viability in its present form, concerns which he expressed in a very fine speech in February of 1998. He challenged all of us to work together constructively for change, both constitutional change and internal change.

Hypothesis: The speech occurred in the early 90s'

Incorrect, it occurred in 1998 which is late 90's


Context: General Olson, you say that the functional equivalent of an unlimited time would be a violation, but that's precisely the argument that's being made by petitioners here, that a limited time which is extendable is the functionable, functional equivalent of an unlimited time, a limited time that 10 years from now can be extended, and then extended again, and extended again. Why -- their argument is precisely that, a limited time doesn't mean anything unless it means, once you have established the limit for works that have been created under that limit, that's the end.

Hypothesis: The petitioners argue that a time limit that can be continuously extended is limited.

The petitioners are arguing the opposite. I think the system got it wrong because the context is confusingly and circularly worded.


Context: The petitioners are drawing attention to the fact that our region has been heavily affected by the groundfish moratorium imposed by Fisheries and Oceans Canada back in May 1994. Since then, the Atlantic Groundfish Strategy, or TAGS, has been the only means of survival for a large part of our population.

Hypothesis: Survival of the tinny population

From 1994 Atlantic Groundfish Strategy, or TAGS means of survival for a large part of our population.


Context: It is probably-and I ask myself the same question as the hon. member for Trois-Rivires does-to pass the time, because the government has no political will to truly lead the country, to advocate new directions for the economy, and to ensure that the injustices created by the cuts it imposed on the provinces are corrected.

Hypothesis: The speaker is in favor of the government actions

The speaker has obvious disdain for what the government is doing


Context: In conclusion, while we on this side of the House are supporting Bill C-67 with no resistance at this time because we believe that the bill is offering advantages to Canadians, we should take the opportunity to scold the government for its foot dragging on implementing further changes to the financial services industry that need to occur.

Hypothesis: In conclusion, while we on this side of the House are supporting Bill B-67 we should  scold the government for not implementing further changes to the financial services industry that need to occur


Context: We are as deeply concerned as most Canadians about the enormous, largely unchecked power of the Prime Minister through governor in council appointments to name political friends of the government to sensitive positions throughout the entire public service, agencies, crown corporations and the like.

Hypothesis: Not name political friends of the government to sensitive positions throughout the entire public service, agencies, crown corporations and the like.

Prime Minister through governor in council appointments to name political friends of the government to sensitive positions. The system was confused by the wording.


Context: I want to help people help themselves, not have government tell people what to do. I just don't think it's the role of the United States to walk into a country and say, we do it this way, so should you. I think we can help. I know we've got to encourage democracy in the marketplaces.

Hypothesis: The speaker is not a fan of people or countries acting independently.

The writer says "I want to help people help themselves, not have government tell people what to do." -so he is in favor of being independent. I guess helping people sends a mixed message.


Context: We have Gary Smith, Rene Kitson, John Shaw, Gary Fraser representing B.C., Paul Brewer, Leslie Hamill, Judith Scott representing NCR, Kevin King, Steve Covell representing the prairies, Mike Benoit, John Irving representing Ontario, Abdelkader Elkak, known as ElKak, Denis Dupre representing Quebec, Byrun Shandler representing the north, Nycole Turmel as an officer, and the negotiator is Luc David.

Hypothesis: Gary Smith, Rene Kitson, John Shaw, Gary Fraser and Paul Brewer represent B.C.

Incorrect because Paul Brewer represents Ontario


Context: Judge, if I may, there are some things here that we can agree with, but there are others that we can't. And this is why, in our opinion, Judge. You know, if our clients are believed, the reporters did talk to them but took misrepresentative statements so that they left things out to put them in a false light and in so doing have created articles that, if they were admitted for the truth of the matter asserted, would be misrepresentative.

Hypothesis: The word judge is used three time in this article.

The word "judge" is only used twice in the article. I'm not sure how the system missed this one.


Context: When we were making the case for Triumph, the $167.5 million grant to the University of British Columbia base research in folic physics and particle physics, one had to explain what this was about, but the most telling argument was the spin-off in high talent, high intelligence based industries in British Columbia.

Hypothesis: University of British Columbia received a grant to research theoretical physics.

It specifically states what the grant was for and theoretical wasn't on there.


Context: In other words you could have -- right now, if Congress decides to have a law, and this law is going to give copyrights in 1) the Bible, 2) Shakespeare, 3) Ben Jonson, and the reason they do it is that they think that that would lead publishers to produce those and distribute them, and they're right, they will, okay? In your view, that's perfectly constitutional?

Hypothesis: The bible is copyrighted


Context: In September, 1998, an invitation was sent by that committee to Dr. Chopra and others to appear before the committee, and a notice of meeting was issued for October 1, 1998. That meeting, however, was cancelled as the scientists stated that they were concerned about the repercussions on their careers if they appeared before our committee.

Hypothesis: The topic of the meeting is clear.

It is incorrect that the topic is clear, it is not stated in the paragraph.


Context: I ask the Prime Minister, who is perhaps better informed, where the terrible threat would be to Canada, to the Canadian federation, in having Quebec representation in the asbestos dispute in the WTO, even if this is, in the eyes of the Quebec Liberal MPs, asking too much, since they are so used to making no demands?

Hypothesis: the prime minister doesn't know enough about this issue

per the statement, he says he is more informed


Context: But I feel very strongly about that. And if I'm elected president, I will do something about that. But I think that we -- I think we have to start with better parenting. But I don't think that we can ignore the role played by guns. I mean, the fact is that there -- even though no state wants them, there are guns in some schools.

Hypothesis: president has a q


Context: I want to make myself clear, we consider the role played by the Export Development Corporation both positive and vital, but we feel it must conduct itself as a crown corporation of a country that cannot blindly encourage and support exports and investments abroad without considering the effects of its action.

Hypothesis: The Export Development Corporation negatively exports investments


Context: If I were a married person and had a child, I would want that child to have the faith that I believe, the faith that I cherish, the faith that I believe has made me a better person, a better citizen of Canada, a better member of my community and which, hopefully, some day would make me a star citizen in the eternity of heaven.

Hypothesis: the speaker is a mother

the speaker is clearly hypothesizing from the standpoint of a parent, which they are not


Context: However, no testimony shall relate to unpublished material or information or to the reporters' motivations, bias, mental impressions, or other information extrinsic to what the reporter saw and heard, and the reporter shall not be obligated to reveal any confidential sources.

Hypothesis: The omission of the identity of confidential sources is not allowed in a reporters' testimony.

The written statement is worded in a way that suggests that a reporter is required to reveal their confidential sources, and this is not the case. The system was fooled by this due to the indirect wording of the statement.


Context: And we have got to again lead by example and help these other countries that are trying to straighten out their situations find the tools in order to do it. I just think, Jim, that this is an absolutely unique period in world history. The world has come together, as I said, they're looking to us.

Hypothesis: The narrator is reluctant to help other countries

No, The narrator wants to lead by example and help other countries


Context: The wrong impression that many have is that somehow through some sanctions a person will be brought into court if their child has been accused or is being charged with an offence before the courts and that somehow the courts will actually be able to hold the parent or guardian accountable.

Hypothesis: Parents are responsisble for their children's behavior in the home as well as the eyes of the law

Parents cannot be charged from a crime their kid commited. The context will trip up the system


Context: Even the overall target referred to in the November 12 statement was put in doubt just eight days later-this is how permanent these commitments are-when the Prime Minister implied to Premiers Tobin and Klein that in his misguided desire to look better than the Americans on this issue, perhaps a new target should be adopted by lowering GHG emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2007.

Hypothesis: GHG emissions are lower than they were in 1990.

If the target is to lower GHG emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2007, then to say that "GHG emissions are lower than they were in 1990" is definitely incorrect.


Context: If we were to take the costs of colour cable TV, free condoms, free bleach for needles, the right to sue and legal costs involved, the right to vote and the administrative and logistical costs involved, gun registration and the cost of patronage appointees the Liberals have put on the parole board, just those costs alone, would we not be able to spend more money on hiring more officers or more judges without the increased raises to get rid of the backlog in the courts?

Hypothesis: This excerpt is written in an unbiased, neutral tone.

I don't know what taking away basic commodities for struggling members of society has to do with spending on the legal system, but if I had to guess, I think the parallel is made to rally sensationalists who are quick to jump to conclusions in an effort to defame the Liberals, which is definitely not unbiased nor neutral - therefore, my statement is definitely incorrect. I think the system had difficulty because it does not understand how politicians in the human world will toy with the emotions of the general population in an attempt to gain political leverage.


Context: The American middle-class family isn't making it right now, Bob. And what the president said about the tax cuts has been wiped out by the increase in health care, the increase in gasoline, the increase in tuitions, the increase in prescription drugs.

Hypothesis: Bob is the President.


Context: It used to be a weekly occurrence. It's now a daily occurrence, and my daughter comes home from school upset about these comments that are being made to her and, you know, is looking for guidance on how to respond to these questions. Also, intelligent design is not a scientific concept.

Hypothesis: daughter contains a qq


Context: It is the work of the official opposition research and communications people, with the supervision and involvement of the hon. member for Medicine Hat, the hon. member for Calgary Southeast, the hon. member for Prince George-Bulkley Valley and the hon. member for Battlefords-Lloydminster.

Hypothesis: The word "member" is used in the text only once.

It was used 4 times, not only once. It's difficult because the system might not know which word I'm asking it to count.


Context: The Canadian opportunities strategy includes Canadian millennium scholarships averaging $3,000 a year up to $15,000 in total for four years; Canada study grants averaging $2,225 per year to help students with the greatest need; support for advanced research as detailed earlier; and tax relief for interest on student loans in the Canada student loan interest relief.

Hypothesis: The Canadian opportunities strategy includes centennial scholarships up to $15,000 total per year in addition to tax relief for interest on student loans

It is definitely incorrect, because the scholarship offers $3,000 per year, totaling $15,000 over four years ie not $15,000 per year


Context: In support of international efforts, we are prepared to take the following steps today: to put a halt to any export credit through the Export Development Corporation; to put on hold any negotiations with the Yugoslav airlines for landing rights; to put on hold any discussions on bilateral efforts; and to consider what kind of support we might provide on a humanitarian basis.

Hypothesis: To support international efforts, we are ready to put on hold considering humanitarian support we can provide.

Actually, we are ready to consider what kind of support we might provide on a humanitarian basis -- not to put this on hold; that phrase applies to the other clauses and fooled the model.


Context: Finally, the last thing that I want to do -I'm answering soliloquy with soliloquy here. I'm not sure if this is a dialogue. Finally, I am acutely cognizant of the fact that this trial has abundant media coverage, and it is surely not my intent to force a constitutional confrontation with two reporters and to create a side show that we don't need to. That's why we're meeting in chambers.

Hypothesis: The writer is answering a dramatic monologue with a dialoge.

The speaker answers a monologue with a monologue, not a dialogue. The system has a hard time conceptualizing words beyond the fact that they have literal meanings.


Context: I'm not for gay marriage. I think marriage is a sacred institution between a man and a woman. And I appreciated the way the administration signed the Defense of Marriage Act. I presume the Vice President supported it when the President signed that bill and supports it now.

Hypothesis: This person believes that gay marriage is a scared institution

This person does NOT believe in gay marriage.


Context: That this House urge the government to conclude an agreement with the provinces and territories, prior to December 31, 1998, and based on the unanimous resolution of the provinces as agreed to last August 7 at Saskatoon, to strengthen the partnership between the federal, provincial and territorial governments in order to secure Canada's social programs for the future.

Hypothesis: The resolution of the provinces was agreed to on August 7, 1998.

The house is urging the government to conclude an agreement prior to December 1998, this would imply that last August refers to 1997 or prior.


Context: It is simply evaluating what the term should be prospectively in a way that we presume this Court should presume is legitimate under the First Amendment. When it legislates retrospectively, it is, in effect, looking at particular authors and estates of authors who are before Congress asking for this extension, and it's choosing between these particular authors and the public at large.

Hypothesis: We must make a choice between these particular authors and Congress

The choice is between the particular authors and the public at large


Context: Mr. Speaker, an internal audit done in 1997 by Consulting and Audit Canada has confirmed what the Bloc Quebecois' analysis clearly showed- political pressure was brought to bear on the administrative staff of Human Resources Development Canada in order to speed up the grant approval process.

Hypothesis: The speaker is a woman

The speaker is addressed as "Mr.Speaker" therefore he is a man.


Context: I believe that if intelligent design could be proved to be scientific, then I would believe it would belong in a science classroom. Would I believe it? I don't know that scientifically I'm qualified to say, you know, that I believe many scientific concepts because I'm -- I'm not a scientist. But I suppose that if intelligent design could follow scientific methods, then -- and it were proven to be scientific by scientists, it was accepted by scientific communities, then I would have no reason not to accept that.

Hypothesis: This person might be a scientist.

The person states that he is not a scientist. The system was confused by the context.


Context: Again, there were many, many things that happened at that school board meeting, and I can tell you that I was very much interested in what was being said. And so I pretty well made sure, at the beginning of that meeting, which went on for quite a long time, that I wouldn't miss anything, so I took care of my bathroom needs beforehand.

Hypothesis: Person went to relieve them self because emergency

The person relieved himself so they wouldn't miss anything. Not because it was an emergency.


Context: It goes without saying that while we are building the infrastructure and building the reputation as one of the premier sporting capitals, not only nationally but internationally, part of the reason we are doing so is that we have high performance young athletes like Eric Daggett.

Hypothesis: National attention is not our only goal when making sporting capitals.

It said that it was also looking for it to be recognized internationally so it is true that national attention is not the only goal.


Context: What Canadians have told us is that regardless of the fact that government is really responsible constitutionally for education, parents, grandparents and young people themselves want all governments to work together toward education and ensuring that every person who wants to get an education is not deprived of getting that education through colleges or universities or other institutions by virtue of the fact that they do not have any money.

Hypothesis: The Canadian government is responsible for education.

In the first sentence it says right there that the "government is really responsible constitutionally for education" So it has to be correct because it's right there in the passage.


Context: I think it's an issue that we need to take very seriously. But I don't think we know the solution to global warming yet. And I don't think we've got all the facts before we make decisions. I tell you one thing I'm not going to do is I'm not going to let the United States carry the burden for cleaning up the world's air. Like Kyoto Treaty would have done. China and India were exempted from that treaty. I think we need to be more even-handed, as evidently 99 senators -- I think it was 99 senators supported that position.

Hypothesis: There is no definitive solution to global warming.

It says that the solution is not yet known, so the statement that there is no definitive solution to global warming is correct.


Context: Now, maybe that explains why he hasn't fully funded the VA and the VA hospital is having trouble and veterans are complaining. Maybe that explains why Medicare patients are complaining about being pushed off of Medicare. He doesn't adequately fund it.

Hypothesis: The VA needs more money.


Context: We expect an order that is consistent with our understanding of an agreement that we reached -- I will let it to you to address that. And my intention would not be to address this again in open court this afternoon. We would just move on. You have other witnesses, I assume, to present, and we can move through this. I'm simply saying I don't want wiggle room that we're waiting to see, because I've had that experience now before.

Hypothesis: There will be open court this afternoon.

He was says that "My intention would not be to address this again in open court this afternoon".


Context: If the verifier determines that a proposed land code and a proposed community approval process of a first nation are in accordance with the Framework Agreement and this Act, the council of the first nation may submit the proposed land code and the individual agreement to the first nation members for their approval.

Hypothesis: In order for the council of the first nation to be able to submit the land code to first nation members for approval, a verifier must begin by verifying that the proposed code does not violate the framework agreement

I basically just reversed the statements in the text so they are still correct but the system got confused by them


Context: Well, I don't believe in command and control out of Washington, D.C. I believe Washington ought to set standards, but again I think we ought to be collaborative at the local levels and I think we ought to work with people at the local levels. And by the way, I just want to make sure -- I can't let him just say something and not correct it.

Hypothesis: He wants to build up small community organizations

The speaker says that he wants to work with people at the local level. A small community organization is at the local level making this statement correct. The model was fooled by the vague subject matter.


Context: There is no question that John Stewart has brought a powerful personal commitment to defining a realistic approach to our unending preoccupation with war and peace in the modern context, which, as he said in one of his early speeches in this house, sometimes tends to tire us out and foster a lack of will to persist in advancing that cause.

Hypothesis: John Stewart is a modern person

It says that John Stewart commented about modern war so he must exist as a modern person


Context: Even though Congress's pattern has been to treat all authors equally? I mean, the reason that it's been prospective and retrospective is that people should be, people who hold copyrights should be subject to the same regime and not have some people who got their copyrights the week before the law passed treated differently than people who got it the week after.

Hypothesis: This is an opinion.

Reason:  Speaker is coming from the first person, and it seems to be an opinion.  Why:  There is no concrete wording that says so.


Context: Mr. Speaker, as we celebrate the 50th anniversaries of both the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights and the founding of the State of Israel I would like to thank the government House leader and the House leaders of all parties for taking a principled stand on the issue of the holocaust denial.

Hypothesis: The governments did not support conspiracy theories

My statement is a another way to phrase the agent. Holocaust denial is a  conspiracy theory making my statement correct. The model was probably ounce again fooled by my choice of words.


Context: Your Committee recommends that its quorum be fixed at seven (7) members, provided that both Houses are represented whenever a vote, resolution or other decision is taken, and that the Joint Chairmen be authorized to hold meetings to receive evidence and authorize the printing thereof so long as four (4) members are present, provided that both Houses are represented; and, that the Committee have the power to engage the services of such expert staff, and such stenographic and clerical staff as may be required.

Hypothesis: they won't vote if only a single house is present.

They said both houses need to be represented if there is no be a vote, so my statement that they won't vote with only one house present is true according to the passage.


Context: We have a copyright term that's consistent with the concept of the creator plus the creator's first generation heirs. We have a copyright term, remember, which supersedes the earlier copyright provisions that were added to the period between creation and publication, so that the limited number of years in the first, the 1790 and the 1831 statute were the number of years plus the relatively unlimited period of time between creation and publication, so we don't have anything remotely like that in this situation.

Hypothesis: legal matters is the topic of this

This is about copyright terms which are legal matters making my statement correct. The model probably got confused by my vague terminology.


Context: I ask the Prime Minister, who is perhaps better informed, where the terrible threat would be to Canada, to the Canadian federation, in having Quebec representation in the asbestos dispute in the WTO, even if this is, in the eyes of the Quebec Liberal MPs, asking too much, since they are so used to making no demands?

Hypothesis: Asbestos is a hot topic according to this text.

The dispute in the text is concerning asbestos so it stands to reason that it is a topic of interest.


Context: I interpret the order and the amended order to mean that Your Honor, in a sense, has addressed them as fact witnesses. I don't think you actually come out and use the word "fact witnesses," but as one reads the order, that's the implication. And you initially had indicated that you did not feel that the reporter's privilege stood in this kind of a case.

Hypothesis: The judges (who was addressed in the text as your honor) order implicates that they were addressed as fact witnesses

The text indicates that the order implicates that they were witnesses, so my statement was correct


Context: The Bloc Quebecois believes that the renewal of the SFOR mandate in Bosnia-Hercegovina should be accompanied by increased support for the International Crime Tribunal, a more significant support for this international court, which is playing a fundamental role with regards to the aftermath of the conflict in Bosnia-Hercegovina.

Hypothesis: The aftermath of the conflict in Bosnia-Hercegovina has caused the Bloc Quebecois to believe that a renewal of the SFOR mandate should be accompanied by increased support for the International Crime Tribunal.

The conflict is definitely the reason why the group believes that there should be a renewal. Without a conflict, then there would be no need for this conversation.


Context: I don't find it beyond the scope of direct. It's appropriate cross-examination. It's overruled on that basis. We're getting argumentative only because I think the witness and counsel are talking over each other. Each of you let the other finish before you start talking.

Hypothesis: Take turns to be less argumentative.


Context: The leadership in advocating these Young Offenders Act reforms has been provided in particular by the hon. member for Crowfoot, the hon. member for West Vancouver-Sunshine Coast, the hon. member for Surrey North, the hon. member for Langley-Abbotsford and many others of my colleagues.

Hypothesis: The leadership includes four individuals.

There are four individuals referenced, so we know there are at least that many.


Context: That notwithstanding Rule 27(3), the Order of the Day for the second reading motion of Bill S-11, An Act to amend the Criminal Code to prohibit coercion in medical procedures that offend a person's religion or belief that human life is inviolable, a public bill, be now restored to the Order Paper , for the purpose of reviving the Bill.

Hypothesis: Bill S-11 was created in order to prevent something from happening.

It was made to prohibit coercion in medical procedures that offend a person's religion... that is made to prevent something so my statement is definitely true.


Context: The Liberal member who just spoke is not going to support this bill and it really puzzles me why a member of the government, not just a member of the House, would stand up in this place, look the Canadian public in the eye by way of the television camera and say ``I will not support your having access to information about how we spend your tax dollars''.

Hypothesis: The last speaker, who was a liberal member, was not supportive at all of the proposed bill, regardless of its merits

The speaker did not support the bill, so my statement was correct


Context: Mr. Speaker, yesterday I wrote to the prime minister asking him whether his government would not see it appropriate to extend to the end of the month of January 1998 the period for charitable donations, to allow all charities in Canada a chance to solicit funds for the cause they defend given the postal strike we have just experienced.

Hypothesis: They want to extend the period for charitable donations beyond 1982

They want to extend the period for charitable donations up to 1998, so that is beyond that period


Context: What I submit -- well, first of all, even the petitioners acknowledge that, as far as prospective limits are concerned, that isn't a judgment that this Court is being made to ask and, in fact, the petitioners acknowledge that it isn't a judgment that this Court should make, so the only point that the petitioners --

Hypothesis: The petitioners know everything.

The context listed the petitioners as a reference for the decisions made by the speaker, but the petitioners don't know everything per the context,only what is listed. How much they know can only be assumed.


Context: In this regard both the Dickson advisory group and the Somalia commission recommended the establishment of a military prosecutor, independent of the chain of command, to deal with serious disciplinary and criminal charges and to be responsible for the conduct of all cases before courts martial.

Hypothesis: The prosecturo didn't fix anything.


Context: Well, I think they ought to look at us as a country that understands freedom where it doesn't matter who you are or how you're raised or where you're from, that you can succeed. I don't think they'll look at us with envy. It really depends upon how our nation conducts itself in foreign policy.

Hypothesis: They look at us with envy.

He said they didn't think they would look at us with envy, but it didn't say definitively. There is no way to know for sure whether we are looked at with envy.


Context: We would assume that when we are dealing with Bill C-66, an act that deals with housing in Canada, there would be some reference or some indication that the government is actually going to do something about the homeless situation, but in fact the answer is that it is doing absolutely nothing.

Hypothesis: Bill C-66 is going into effect in Canada.

It doesn't state if it is going into effect.


Context: The fact is that there have been markets shut to us that we haven't stood up and fought for. I'm going to fight for a fair trade playing field for the American worker. And I will fight for the American worker just as hard as I fight for my own job. That's what the American worker wants. And if we do that, we can have an impact.

Hypothesis: The American worker wants more access.


Context: Can the Minister of National Defence tell us whether such a program is indeed in the works and whether the government is getting ready not to renew the lease with the Fort Saint-Jean campus in order to resume full possession of the royal military college facilities in Saint-Jean?

Hypothesis: Fort Saint-Jean campus will not be renewed.

They are asking whether it will be renewed or not so they don't know if it will be.


Context: Is the Prime Minister aware that his Minister of Human Resources Development is not even capable of meeting with Quebec's education sector, including students, because the latter are demanding that the Government of Quebec be present at these meetings, and that the federal government has no other choice now but to rethink its decision?

Hypothesis: The Prime Minister has no family

There is no way of telling from this passage whether the prime minister has family


Context: We need the independence to make sure that the office will not interfere with the military structure whatsoever and that it will act as an ombudsman for people in the military structure, either family members in the military, the military personnel themselves or civilian members of the Canadian Armed Forces who are involved with the military.

Hypothesis: They will always have independence.

The statement was arguing why they needed independence, however there is no way to know if they will always have independence. That sort of thing can change as time goes on.


Context: -- what weighs in that balance, because to go back for one second, in practical, economic terms I gather the difference between a copyright that lasts for 100 years, lasts for 1,000 years, lasts forever, is probably something less than 1,000 -- on $1,000 a penny.

Hypothesis: Going back one second is important.

It's never directly stated the importance of going back for one second, only what can be achieved. It's only implied that it's important, but it's not in the context.


Context: I certainly want to add my thanks and congratulations to Dr. Henry Friesen, who has provided leadership to the country as head of the Medical Research Council for a long period of time, and who has worked very hard to move that model toward the one we have today, and who in fact talked himself out of a job.

Hypothesis: The speaker was very poor.

It isn't known if they are rich or poor.


Context: These criteria and conditions, pillars of Canada's health care system, are: one, reasonable access to medically required services unimpeded by charges at the point of service or other barriers; two, comprehensive coverage for medically required services; three, universality of insured coverage for all provincial residents on equal terms and conditions; four, portability of benefits within Canada and abroad; and five, public administration of the health insurance plan on a non-profit basis.

Hypothesis: The system only costs the rich money.

It isn't known who the system costs the most money.


Context: Since 1982, the federal government has been dragging along, like a ball and chain, a constitution that has never been accepted by one whole founding people, by one whole province, one of the most important provinces, one that was there from the beginnings of Canada, that was the place where European life in North America began.

Hypothesis: The federal government has no constitutional authority.

If the constitution has not been fully ratified, the constitutional basis for the authority of the federal government (not the *actual* authority of the government) is in question, therefore my statement is neither definitely correct nor incorrect.


Context: I don't think we agree on that. I would certainly also be judicious in evaluating any potential use of American troops overseas. I think we have to be very reticent about that. But look, Jim, the world is changing so rapidly. The way I see it, the world is getting much closer together.

Hypothesis: The speaker is male.

Reason:  The gender of the agent is never specified.  Why: A male name is used in the context.


Context: But there were comments from Bill Buckingham about brainwashing, and I remember hearing that, the whole thing about brainwashing, because it dealt with going to college and getting this education and students who go to college become brainwashed. And I was very upset by that because I attended college and I don't feel as if I were brainwashed.

Hypothesis: The speaker knows Bill Buckingham.

Reason:  The speaker knows the comments, but may not know Bill Buckingham personally. Why:  Buckingham's name is in the contaxt.


Context: I am -- you know it's really interesting. I tell the people on the campaign trail, when I asked Laura to marry me, she said, "Fine, just so long as I never have to give a speech. "I said, "OK, you've got a deal. "Fortunately, she didn't hold me to that deal. And she's out campaigning along with our girls. And she speaks English a lot better than I do. I think people understand what she's saying.

Hypothesis: His girls are still in school.

I'm right. There is no indication of the girl's ages. The could still be school aged.


Context: The members on the government side of the House should listen to the Law Society of British Columbia which wrote to the solicitor general and said an essential principle of a democratic government is that all people are equal before the law and are equally entitled to fairness and due process.

Hypothesis: The members on the government side of the House have fun on weekends

The members on the government side of the House may or may not have fun on weekends but it isn't known


Context: I dare not say it was a revelation to him because he was already quite aware of the problem, but he came face to face with it and was able to see with his own eyes-the member for Chambly is a hands-on kind of guy-how important low income housing, co-op housing, is in terms of social action.

Hypothesis: He didn't pay attention in school

It is unknown whether he paid attention in school