From ba1f828c09458ab0ae83d42eaacc2cf8720c7957 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: An Yang <yangapku@users.noreply.huggingface.co>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 19:10:07 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Update README.md

---
 README.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 9a40762..3a1d398 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ if __name__ == "__main__":
     print(f"Bot: {response_3}")
 ```
 
-> **Note**
+> [!NOTE]
 > For API compatibility, when `enable_thinking=True`, regardless of whether the user uses `/think` or `/no_think`, the model will always output a block wrapped in `<think>...</think>`. However, the content inside this block may be empty if thinking is disabled.
 > When `enable_thinking=False`, the soft switches are not valid. Regardless of any `/think` or `/no_think` tags input by the user, the model will not generate think content and will not include a `<think>...</think>` block.